2006
DOI: 10.2307/27516124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mateship: Trust and Exclusion in Australian History

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a highly prized cultural currency (Dyrenfurth 2015), mateship was both lauded and critiqued by this participant. Herein the strength of those connections, regardless of their authenticity, and the company of other men was normed as silently promoting mental health without explicitly discussing men’s mental health challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a highly prized cultural currency (Dyrenfurth 2015), mateship was both lauded and critiqued by this participant. Herein the strength of those connections, regardless of their authenticity, and the company of other men was normed as silently promoting mental health without explicitly discussing men’s mental health challenges.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contextualising and perhaps contesting the normative demands for men to be self-reliant in solving their own mental health challenges were participants’ subjectivities about the importance of genuine social connectedness and comradery. Seemingly contradictory to ideals of strength and self-reliance, participants discussed the concept of mateship—a cultural idiom referring to the social bounty and bond between men, underscored by qualities of friendship, loyalty, and equality (Dyrenfurth 2015)—where connecting with other men was viewed as one of the most important avenues for supporting men’s mental health. For these men, mateship was associated with selflessness, belonging, and mutual help.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, subsequent Australian myths emphasise the distinctive nature of Australia from Britain, such as myths of 'mateship'. 127 Russel Ward argued that the origins of Australia's national identity were to be found in the antiauthoritarian and egalitarian ethos of convict society, giving rise to a collectivist concept of mateship in a classless society. 128 In the twentieth century, Australian myths of national character emphasised and developed as a result of the ANZAC involvement in World War I.…”
Section: Power and National And Religious Mythsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That 27 participants (over 64%) reported low social distance with respect to the mother's status (1 -2 on the scale) aligns with the Australian principles of equality and mateship, even in socially imbalanced interactions (Dyrenfurth, 2015;Formentelli & Hajek, 2013;Sinkeviciute, 2014). One can therefore gather that the participants tend to adhere to an Australian understanding of this relationship.…”
Section: The Social Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%