2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2632682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

$\mathcal {L}_{1}$ Adaptive Backstepping for Robust Trajectory Tracking of UAVs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two controllers, i.e., the inner-loop backstepping-based sliding mode controller defined in (9), (19) and (25) and the outer-loop integral sliding mode defined in (28), (34) and (35), are applied to validate the robustness and trajectory tracking performance of the proposed scheme. The desired trajectory is chosen to be To explore the effectiveness of our proposed controller, the following three scenarios are considered.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two controllers, i.e., the inner-loop backstepping-based sliding mode controller defined in (9), (19) and (25) and the outer-loop integral sliding mode defined in (28), (34) and (35), are applied to validate the robustness and trajectory tracking performance of the proposed scheme. The desired trajectory is chosen to be To explore the effectiveness of our proposed controller, the following three scenarios are considered.…”
Section: A Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in some cases, the design of a controller for a classical helicopter could be applied to a quadrotor with some modifications and vice versa. Many studies have considered multiple nonlinear controllers for different autonomous control designs of quadrotors, such as feedback linearization [12]- [15], dynamic inversion [16], singular perturbation [17], sliding mode control [18]- [21], backstepping [18], [22]- [28], and other related adaptive nonlinear controllers [10], [18], [29], [30]. Considering fault tolerant control (FTC), various nonlinear algorithms including backstepping, sliding mode and adaptive FTC approaches for quadrotor attitude and altitude tracking can be found in [31], [32], and references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And several approaches have been proved to be effective in the disturbance rejection of UAV systems. [13][14][15] In the work of Zuo et al, 13 the  1 adaptive backstepping control was proposed for the trajectory tracking of UAVs in presence of modeling uncertainties and external disturbances. In the work of Smith et al 14 and Castañeda et al, 15 observer-based control methods were studied, where the disturbance observer based controller was designed for a small fixed wing UAV with disturbance rejection in the work of Smith et al, 14 and in the work of Castañeda et al, 15 an extended observer based controller was proposed based on the adaptive second order sliding mode control approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [8], an attitude tracking control objective for quadrotor UAV with external disturbances was realized by adopting quaternion feedback and integral backstepping control technique, in the end, the simulation results indicated that, the angular velocities were sensitive to external disturbances. Different with all the control schemes mentioned above, a novel L 1 adaptive backstepping control technique which was based upon the inner-outer loop architecture has been presented in [9], and in which, the position control loop was mainly designed to deal with position subsystem with uncertainties and disturbances, while the attitude control loop was responsible for stabilizing the attitude angles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%