1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1684(98)00115-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical analysis and experimental investigation of noise in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging applied in polymer gel dosimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The sampling time was 1.0 ms to achieve an optimal signal-to-noise ratio for tissues with a short T2 (the T2 of cortical bone is approximately 1.5 ms). The second-echo time was also chosen to optimize R2 fitting (TE 2 5 1.747 ms) (14). In addition, the shortest possible repetition time (4 ms) was chosen to reduce total image acquisition time.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Phantom Ute Mr and Ct Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sampling time was 1.0 ms to achieve an optimal signal-to-noise ratio for tissues with a short T2 (the T2 of cortical bone is approximately 1.5 ms). The second-echo time was also chosen to optimize R2 fitting (TE 2 5 1.747 ms) (14). In addition, the shortest possible repetition time (4 ms) was chosen to reduce total image acquisition time.…”
Section: Acquisition Of Phantom Ute Mr and Ct Imagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Weak echo signals degrade R2 values signi2icantly (14) . In their study, two point 2it method with no report of thresholding was used for R2 extraction, while, we used many point 2it method (15) and those echoes with SNR less than 3 were excluded from data analysis (16) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centre of the recorded slice was positioned at 8 mm from the top of the phantom (including 4 mm Barex™). A fitting of the intensity of 31 equidistant consecutive base images to a monoexponential decay using χ²-minimalisation was performed to obtain R 2 maps [7]. R 2 maps were calibrated to dose maps using the dose-R 2 relationship extracted from the calibration phantoms.…”
Section: Mri Read-outmentioning
confidence: 99%