2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cocis.2012.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical analysis and numerical simulation of multi-phase multi-component flow in heterogeneous porous media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An open-source MATLAB implementation offering a flexible discretization which can be used in more complex structures has also been developed [56]. A good review of recent efforts to develop either semianalytical solutions for one-dimensional (1D) verification or novel numerical schemes for solving the governing equations efficiently is provided by Geiger, Schmid, and Zaretskiy [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An open-source MATLAB implementation offering a flexible discretization which can be used in more complex structures has also been developed [56]. A good review of recent efforts to develop either semianalytical solutions for one-dimensional (1D) verification or novel numerical schemes for solving the governing equations efficiently is provided by Geiger, Schmid, and Zaretskiy [38].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lax's stability conditions for discontinuities of system (1-3) project onto those for the auxiliary system (7) [13]. Now let's introduce diffusion with corresponding Peclet number 1/ d into system (1-3) (see [2,5] for detailed derivations). The system (1-3) becomes hyperbolic for  c = t = d =0.…”
Section: Solution Of the Auxiliary Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the transformation (5) splits the systems with diffusion too. The splitting method (5) can be extended to three-dimensional flows in the case where the total mobility of two phases is constant. Introduction of a linear co-ordinate along the stream-lines splits the three-dimensional system into one-dimensional system (1-3) and a Laplace equation for a real pressure distribution (see the corresponding derivations in [2,23]).…”
Section: General Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Models have been developed that provide detailed representations of pore structures and resolve bubble transport at the subpore level (µm), but due to their high computational demands these models are of limited use in addressing plot and field‐scale (1–100 m) questions relating to longer time scales of days to months. At present, coarser‐scale models can provide large‐scale predictions (1–100 m) of bubble movement and ebullition over long time periods (1–25 year) [ Amos and Mayer , ], but predictive uncertainty is high because the modeled spatial resolutions do not permit a detailed description of a porous medium and exclude important structural features (e.g., fractures, poorly permeable layers) that significantly alter bubble transport [ Thomson and Johnson , ; Geiger et al ., ; Helmig et al ., ]. Therefore, a major theoretical and computational challenge is to model bubble movement and ebullition at large spatiotemporal scales (≥1 m and >month), but to represent explicitly the spatial heterogeneity of the porous medium in order to reduce model uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%