1972
DOI: 10.1115/1.3449886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical and Experimental Modeling of the Circulation Patterns in Glass Melts

Abstract: Natural convection currents in a rectangular two-dimensional enclosure representative of the longitudinal section of an industrial glass-melting furnace have been established by both model experiments and numerical calculation. For the latter a finite-difference method has been employed to solve the time-dependent coupled flow and energy equations. The highly generalized mathematical model makes allowance for buoyancy, temperature-dependent viscosity, and diffusive radiation. Generalized boundary conditions ar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirements for realistic glass depth and mean residence time in the relatively short research tank are the factors largely responsible for the lower velocity in the smaller tank. The Reynolds numbers in both tanks are very low (Table 2-2), supporting the conclusion of Noble et al (1972) that the effect of the through-flow is negligible. Because the Reynolds number in the industrial tank is already so small, the factor of 4 decrease in Reynolds number in the research tank will have minimal impact on the flow field.…”
Section: Scaling Considerations: Pull Rate Melting Area Glass Depthsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The requirements for realistic glass depth and mean residence time in the relatively short research tank are the factors largely responsible for the lower velocity in the smaller tank. The Reynolds numbers in both tanks are very low (Table 2-2), supporting the conclusion of Noble et al (1972) that the effect of the through-flow is negligible. Because the Reynolds number in the industrial tank is already so small, the factor of 4 decrease in Reynolds number in the research tank will have minimal impact on the flow field.…”
Section: Scaling Considerations: Pull Rate Melting Area Glass Depthsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Noble et al (1972) noted that for values of the Prandtl number, Pr >> 1, which is the case in glass tanks, Equations (7) and (8) imply that the inertial forces in the flow are negligible compared with the buoyant and viscous forces, and that the solution is therefore not a function of the Prandtl number. This was confirmed by Wright and Rawson (1973), who found that solutions for the streamlines and temperature distribution in their two-dimensional model were independent of Prandtl number over the range of values of practical interest.…”
Section: Scaling Considerations: Pull Rate Melting Area Glass Depthmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, the velocities and temperature profiles near the sources and sinks exhibited the features of boundary layer flows. Although good agreement was obtained between the measured and computed velocity fields for a single longitudinal plane, the computed temperature outside the boundary layer predicted a systematically lower temperature than the experimental observation (Noble et al, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%