2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-022-01366-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical metacognitive characteristics of Chinese middle school students in efficient mathematics learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When they encounter their own metacognitive problems, they will better implement the program, improving their level of mathematical metacognition. This is consistent with this paper's intervention results and further verifies that the improvement in mathematical metacognitive level can improve learning efficiency and thus achieve higher academic achievement [7]. For students in the group with lower scores, their mathematical knowledge was relatively weak.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When they encounter their own metacognitive problems, they will better implement the program, improving their level of mathematical metacognition. This is consistent with this paper's intervention results and further verifies that the improvement in mathematical metacognitive level can improve learning efficiency and thus achieve higher academic achievement [7]. For students in the group with lower scores, their mathematical knowledge was relatively weak.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Good mathematical metacognition can help students manage their efficiency while learning mathematics [4]. Studies have revealed that students' metacognition in mathematics can effectively promote the development of mathematical achievement [5,6] and students with high levels of mathematical metacognition have higher mathematical learning efficiency [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike Flavell's classification, Brown (1987) categorized metacognition into two parts: metacognitive knowledge and metacognitive control. Based on Flavell and Brown's classification of metacognition, some researchers have conducted further research on mathematical metacognition (Wang et al 2017;Wilson and Clarke 2004). For example, Wang et al (2017) proposed that mathematical metacognition comprises mathematical metacognitive knowledge, experiences, and monitoring, and developed its assessment scales.…”
Section: Metacognition and Mathematical Modeling Skillsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is crucial for teachers to improve their teaching quality and cultivate differentiated learning engagement strategies for different students. When the teaching quality has been improved, and students’ comprehension becomes better, the necessary learning time for students will be shorter, so it is necessary to improve teaching quality and enhance students’ comprehensive literacy in order to improve the students’ learning efficiency and save time [ 44 ].…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%