2001
DOI: 10.1137/1.9780898718324
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Methods in Image Reconstruction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
748
0
18

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 928 publications
(771 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
748
0
18
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to get 69 views, 67 uneven views were picked and the other two views at −72.6° and 72.6° were added. In fact, it is the EA sampling that is popular in practice (Natterer and Wubbeling, 2001), even for missing wedge problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to get 69 views, 67 uneven views were picked and the other two views at −72.6° and 72.6° were added. In fact, it is the EA sampling that is popular in practice (Natterer and Wubbeling, 2001), even for missing wedge problems.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be viewed as a nonlinear generalization of the algebraic reconstruction technique (ART) in x-ray tomography [Nat86,NW01]. In contrary to the filtered backprojection method mentioned earlier, ART uses only part of the data in each step of the reconstruction.…”
Section: Sensitivities and The Adjoint Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique is based on the acquisition of X-ray shadow projections of a sample which is step-wise rotated over a wide range of angular orientations. The X-ray shadow projections are used to reconstruct 2D CT slices of the object through a back-projection procedure (s. Natterer and Wübbeling, 2001 for a review on back-projection algorithms). Because blurring is inherent to reconstruction by back-projection, the raw X-ray shadow projections have to be convoluted by high-pass filtering.…”
Section: Principles Of Conventional Vs Sem Micro-ctmentioning
confidence: 99%