1965
DOI: 10.1119/1.1971408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Methods of Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
52
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is natural to suppose that it is these harmonics that are responsible for the comparatively large responses at frequencies Ω that are large compared with Ω m , which are evident in Figs 1–3. It is particularly interesting that this response cuts off for driving frequencies ω that are large compared with 2Ω, rather than Ω, a fact that would suggest that one is observing the effects of a broad 2:1 resonance similar to that arising in the standard Matthieu equation (see, e.g., Matthews & Walker 1964).…”
Section: Parametric Resonance and Transient Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural to suppose that it is these harmonics that are responsible for the comparatively large responses at frequencies Ω that are large compared with Ω m , which are evident in Figs 1–3. It is particularly interesting that this response cuts off for driving frequencies ω that are large compared with 2Ω, rather than Ω, a fact that would suggest that one is observing the effects of a broad 2:1 resonance similar to that arising in the standard Matthieu equation (see, e.g., Matthews & Walker 1964).…”
Section: Parametric Resonance and Transient Chaosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the usual Itô and corresponding Stratonovich discretizations are defined such that the path integral reduces to the Fokker-Planck equation in the weak-noise limit. The term R/6 in the Feynman Lagrangian includes a contribution of R/12 from the WKBJ approximation 54 (named after Wentzel, Kramers, Brillouin, and Jefferys) to the same order of (∆t) 3/2 .…”
Section: Algebraic Complexity Yields Simple Intuitive Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sensitivity [10] [11] or survey speed [12] , for example, could be chosen. Lagrange multipliers [13] can be used to determine the optimal design parameters of a telescope. Similarly, if the design parameters are stacked to form a column vector p which is N p dimensional, we can use it to define an arbitrary function to find the figure of merit as F (p).Assuming that C max is the maximum cost, we can formulate C(p) which represents the cost function as shown in (1)…”
Section: Lagrange Multipliermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, assuming a fixed number of antennas, we proceed to optimize with respect to N s and B assuming a linear cost function, we obtain (13).…”
Section: Case Ii: Antenna Number Per Station Is Constantmentioning
confidence: 99%