Mathematical model of adult stem cell regeneration with cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic regulation

Abstract

Adult stem cells, which exist throughout the body, multiply by cell division to replenish dying cells or to promote regeneration to repair damaged tissues. To perform these functions during the lifetime of organs or tissues, stem cells need to maintain their populations in a faithful distribution of their epigenetic states, which are susceptible to stochastic fluctuations during each cell division, unexpected injury, and potential genetic mutations that occur during many cell divisions. However, it remains unclear how the three processes of differentiation, proliferation, and apoptosis in regulating stem cells collectively manage these challenging tasks. Here, without considering molecular details, we propose a genetic optimal control model for adult stem cell regeneration that includes the three fundamental processes, along with cell division and adaptation based on differential fitnesses of phenotypes. In the model, stem cells with a distribution of epigenetic states are required to maximize expected performance after each cell division. We show that heterogeneous proliferation that depends on the epigenetic states of stem cells can improve the maintenance of stem cell distributions to create balanced populations. A control strategy during each cell division leads to a feedback mechanism involving heterogeneous proliferation that can accelerate regeneration with less fluctuation in the stem cell population. When mutation is allowed, apoptosis evolves to maximize the performance during homeostasis after multiple cell divisions. The overall results highlight the importance of cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic regulation and the performance objectives during homeostasis in shaping a desirable heterogeneous distribution of stem cells in epigenetic states.fitness function | optimization | robustness | dynamic programming | systems biology

Emergence of Drug Tolerance in Cancer Cell Populations: An Evolutionary Outcome of Selection, Nongenetic Instability, and Stress-Induced Adaptation

“…Such modeling has been previously proposed in ref. 44, using a one-dimensional, phenotype-like structure variable. By using a multidimensional phenotype, we consider differential effects of epimutations on genes responsible for the classical intracellular pathways of proliferation and survival.…”

Synthesizing developmental trajectories

“…Second, following the step of data fusion, one can attempt to model the observed multivariable dynamics. Here one can employ several modeling methodologies, from mechanistic modeling of specific molecular and tissue-level processes [31][32][33][34][35], to equationfree approaches, which aim to deduce the underlying mechanisms directly from data [36,37].…”

Less Utilized Prognostic Markers in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

“…Nevertheless, LPCs play a major role as they speed up production of leukemic blasts [60] . Other mathematical models has been established to characterize stem cells based on signaling interaction with the environment [61] and determine how stem cells coordinate homeostasis through cross-talk between genetic and epigenetic regulation [62] . Mathematical and computational techniques were also used to gain insights into the biology of cancer stem cells in initiation, progression and response to treatment in chronic myeloid leukaemia (reviewed in Michor, 2008 [63] ), to determine how mutations deregulate stem cell homeostasis and induces cancer [64] , how kinetics of cancer stem cell sustain growth [65] and to strategise how to eliminate cancer stem cells [66] .…”

“…Complete remission is achievable in 65% de novo AML and 41% secondary AML. Median overall survival for these patients was 1119 days for age 16-55 years (N=554), 350 days for age [56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65] years (N = 437) and 80 days for patients aged 76-89 year old (N = 968) [1] . The French-American-British (FAB) classification of acute myeloid leukemias, the first classification established more than 40 years ago, identifies eight subtypes (M0-M7) based on morphology and cytochemistry staining.…”