2014
DOI: 10.1002/jcp.24482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Model of Liver Regeneration in Human Live Donors

Abstract: Liver regeneration after injury occurs in many mammals. Rat liver regenerates after partial hepatectomy over a period of 2 weeks while human liver regeneration takes several months. Notwithstanding this enormous difference in time-scales, with new data from five human live liver transplant donors, we show that a mathematical model of rat liver regeneration can be transferred to human, with all biochemical interactions and signaling unchanged. Only six phenomenological parameters need change, and three of these… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We therefore tested several alternate hypotheses that may be able to explain the differences in regeneration profiles between rats and humans. We tested the hypotheses that humans have an altered stress response compared to rats (Hyp 1); that humans have altered matrix remodeling dynamics and ECM-GF binding compared to rats (Hyp 2); that human hepatocytes have an altered transition time between physiological states (Hyp 3); and that human hepatocytes have a longer cell cycle, a higher apoptosis rate, a higher requiescence rate, and an altered transition rate between physiological states, as was assumed by Periwal et al [ 29 ] (Hyp 4). The study by Periwal et al [ 29 ] reduced the values of parameters controlling the hepatocyte cell cycle rate, apoptosis rate, and requiescence rate by a factor of 24, roughly the difference in lifespan between rats and humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We therefore tested several alternate hypotheses that may be able to explain the differences in regeneration profiles between rats and humans. We tested the hypotheses that humans have an altered stress response compared to rats (Hyp 1); that humans have altered matrix remodeling dynamics and ECM-GF binding compared to rats (Hyp 2); that human hepatocytes have an altered transition time between physiological states (Hyp 3); and that human hepatocytes have a longer cell cycle, a higher apoptosis rate, a higher requiescence rate, and an altered transition rate between physiological states, as was assumed by Periwal et al [ 29 ] (Hyp 4). The study by Periwal et al [ 29 ] reduced the values of parameters controlling the hepatocyte cell cycle rate, apoptosis rate, and requiescence rate by a factor of 24, roughly the difference in lifespan between rats and humans.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, evidence suggests that both the local injury response and eventual repair outcome differ as a function of tissue type. For example, injured adult skin heals more slowly, and with more scar formation, than adult oral mucosa ( Schrementi et al, 2008 ; Szpaderska et al, 2003 ) and, under permissive conditions, the regeneration-privileged adult liver ( Periwal et al, 2014 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we adapted the phenomenological parameters in the cellular equations, whereas the molecular equations and the related parameters were kept as intact as possible (Table S1). Notably, the same approach has been successfully used in adapting the rat model (Furchtgott et al., 2009) to reproduce data from humans (Periwal et al., 2014) because the biochemistry of liver regeneration is probably similar in different mammals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling has been used to describe liver functions and dynamics in mammals under normal and pathological conditions (Cook et al., 2015, Furchtgott et al., 2009, Holzhütter et al., 2012, Periwal et al., 2014). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%