2004
DOI: 10.1007/s11663-004-0037-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical modeling of a direct current electric arc: Part II. Dimensionless representation of a direct current arc

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A quadratic relationship between the arc radius and the axial distance was proposed in our previous publication, in which the shape of the Ar arcs was presented [11], in accordance with the arc shapes reported by other authors [10,31]. However, under the operating conditions used in this study and due to the inclusion of the Prandtl number to represent the shape of the arc, a logarithmic relationship is the best description of the arc shape.…”
Section: Shape Of the Arcsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…A quadratic relationship between the arc radius and the axial distance was proposed in our previous publication, in which the shape of the Ar arcs was presented [11], in accordance with the arc shapes reported by other authors [10,31]. However, under the operating conditions used in this study and due to the inclusion of the Prandtl number to represent the shape of the arc, a logarithmic relationship is the best description of the arc shape.…”
Section: Shape Of the Arcsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…In our investigation of the effect of Lorentz forces on bath stirring, we note that in the systems studied temperatures may exceed the Curie temperature, over which the ferromagnetic material becomes paramagnetic. In our current magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) formulation, the induced magnetic field was modelled as an external field, the values of which were taken to be 10 to 100 times higher than those in the relevant literature [ 15 , 37 , 38 ], in order to test whether the effect of the magnetic field may be ignored. As indicated by the data in table 4 , the magnetic field contribution is, in fact, negligible, in accordance with our previous three-dimensional modelling of the EAF [ 9 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The arc shape can then be expressed as: The value of the offset is z = 0.9310 R c , which can be expressed as the rule of thumb that the vertex of the parabola lies inside the electrode at a depth equal to the radius of the cathode area. Several authors have proposed similar arc shapes by a quadratic behaviour of the arc radius as a function of the axial distance [17,24], but Equation (2) describing the arc radius has not been proposed before.…”
Section: Arc Shapementioning
confidence: 99%