2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11538-011-9648-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modeling of Axonal Formation Part I: Geometry

Abstract: A stochastic model is proposed for the position of the tip of an axon. Parameters in the model are determined from laboratory data. The first step is the reduction of inherent error in the laboratory data, followed by estimating parameters and fitting a mathematical model to this data. Several axonogenesis aspects have been investigated, particularly how positive axon elongation and growth cone kinematics are coupled processes but require very different theoretical descriptions. Preliminary results have been o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These studies show that physical stimuli (gradients of various molecular species, stiffness of the growth substrate, traction forces generated during axonal extension etc.) play a key role in the wiring of the nervous system [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, our current understanding of neuronal growth is mostly qualitative, the vast complexity of the parameter space still prohibiting fully quantitative predictions of outcomes from given initial conditions such as: geometry of the neuronal circuit, type of biochemical cues on the growth substrate, topography or mechanical properties of the substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies show that physical stimuli (gradients of various molecular species, stiffness of the growth substrate, traction forces generated during axonal extension etc.) play a key role in the wiring of the nervous system [3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, our current understanding of neuronal growth is mostly qualitative, the vast complexity of the parameter space still prohibiting fully quantitative predictions of outcomes from given initial conditions such as: geometry of the neuronal circuit, type of biochemical cues on the growth substrate, topography or mechanical properties of the substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar models have been adopted for axon growth in the literature for symmetric surfaces. 18,19 To interpret the observed alignment of the axonal growth along the asymmetric surfaces, we derived the expected distribution of the tangent angles from a biased random walk model. The motion of the growth cone is described by the following Langevin equation, m _ v ¼ Àav þ F þ nðtÞ, where m is an effective mass, t is the time, a is a Stokes drag coefficient, F is a constant force, and nðtÞ is a random force which has zero mean hni ¼ 0 and is Markovian hnðtÞ Á nðt 0 Þi ¼ m 2 Cdðt À t 0 Þ, where C represents the strength of the noise and d is the Dirac delta function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successive steps were anticorrelated (Fig 6.11H), which was not accounted for in a previous model [123]. This helps the paths remain relatively straight: if successive steps were positively correlated, the paths would become more bent over time.…”
Section: Ditionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A common way to achieve correlation between successive steps is through a non-uniform turning angle distribution. Pearson et al [123] used a correlated random walk model to describe the trajectories of rat pyramidal neurons. The instantaneous turning angle θ is a function of the arc length s from the axon's initiation point.…”
Section: Random Walk Models Of Growth Cone Trajectoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation