1998
DOI: 10.1080/00423119808969453
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Modelling of Vibrations and Loading of Railway Tanks Taking into Account the Liquid Cargo Mobility

Abstract: Dynamics and loading of railway tank cars transporting liquid cargo are investigated. The approach based on the mechanical-pendulum analogy for the liquid cargo mobility simulation is proposed. Hydrodynamic parameters of the mechanical analogy are determined using the solution of the boundary-value problem for the liquid cargo vibrations in a cavity with the tank boiler shape. The fitting of the developed mathematical models is proved by comparison of calculated results and test data. Vibration characteristics… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, comparison with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations has shown that these simplified models are not able to accurately represent the system parameters, capture the effect of the distributed inertia and elasticity, or model the shape of the free surface. [12][13][14] Modern analysis methods for liquid sloshing typically use CFD algorithms and finite volume and boundary element methods. 7,15 However, the integration of the Eulerian-based liquid sloshing models with the computational Lagrangian-based MBS vehicle algorithms is difficult because of the fundamental differences between the two approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, comparison with computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulations has shown that these simplified models are not able to accurately represent the system parameters, capture the effect of the distributed inertia and elasticity, or model the shape of the free surface. [12][13][14] Modern analysis methods for liquid sloshing typically use CFD algorithms and finite volume and boundary element methods. 7,15 However, the integration of the Eulerian-based liquid sloshing models with the computational Lagrangian-based MBS vehicle algorithms is difficult because of the fundamental differences between the two approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cosimulations of the MBD model of the tank car and liquid slosh model were initiated at time t ¼ 0, assuming zero initial values for liquid slosh force and moment (F y,S t ð Þ ¼ 0; M V t ð Þ ¼ 0Þ under zero lateral acceleration and roll angle of the tank. The state-space equations (14) were solved in Matlab/ Simulink under instantaneous lateral acceleration at the geometric center of tank and roll angle response obtained from the MBD model of the tank car. The resulting slosh force and roll moment were subsequently applied to the MBD model in UM software to compute the car body responses, subject to slosh force F y,S t ð Þ and roll moment M V ðtÞ.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is rather difficult to integrate such complex finite element fluid flow models into a MBS simulation program, an equivalent multi-body model was sought that would be able to represent the liquid's sloshing and its interaction with the vehicle [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Development and Incorporation Of The Fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sloshing movements of liquids inside containers are usually simulated by means of highly sophisticated finite element computer programs able to solve the complex fluid flow equations, such as Navier-Stokes equations. Since it is rather difficult to intégrate such complex finite element fluid flow models into a multibody system simulation program, an equivalent multibody model was sought that would be able to represent the liquid's sloshing and its interaction with the vehicle [6][7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Development and Incorporation Of The Fluid Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%