2018
DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Models for Predicting Development of Orius majusculus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) and Its Applicability to Biological Control

Abstract: Complete development of Orius majusculus Reuter (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) at nine constant temperatures, between 12 and 34°C, was evaluated under laboratory conditions. The maximum developmental period of 90.75 d occurred at 12°C, whereas the minimum of 11.34 d occurred at 30°C. From 30 to 34°C, the developmental period increased to 13.50 d. Between 21 and 33°C the survival rate was more than 80%. The optimal temperature when considering developmental rate and survival was between 24 and 30°C. At constant te… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, behavioural thermoregulation could superficially cause deviations from the null hypothesis (given Jensen's inequality) by creating a discrepancy between measured temperatures and actual body temperatures (Ma et al, 2021; Woods et al, 2015). Indeed, with robust methodology (see Box 1), inherent effects of thermal fluctuations (Milosavljević et al, 2020) stand out as the exception rather than the rule (Khelifa et al, 2019; Ludwig & Cable, 1933; Martínez‐García et al, 2018). This is corroborated by the similarities between simulated and observed differences in development times between fluctuating and constant temperatures across a large number of studies, species and thermal regimes (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, behavioural thermoregulation could superficially cause deviations from the null hypothesis (given Jensen's inequality) by creating a discrepancy between measured temperatures and actual body temperatures (Ma et al, 2021; Woods et al, 2015). Indeed, with robust methodology (see Box 1), inherent effects of thermal fluctuations (Milosavljević et al, 2020) stand out as the exception rather than the rule (Khelifa et al, 2019; Ludwig & Cable, 1933; Martínez‐García et al, 2018). This is corroborated by the similarities between simulated and observed differences in development times between fluctuating and constant temperatures across a large number of studies, species and thermal regimes (Figure 5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Orius strigicollis as a BCA has been reported for the thermal influence on the population growth without considering the simultaneous alert on its prey Pectinophora gossypiella at three constant temperatures (24,28, and 32 • C) [17]. Growth and development of Orius majusculuss were evaluated under nine constant temperature conditions ranging from 12 to 34 • C [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%