“…We now consider the seventh addendum in the right hand side of formula (4.10). Since B 1 is analytic, Lemma 4.5 (ii) and the product Proposition 3.6 (iii) imply that DB 1 (x − y)a (2) ν(y) belongs to K 0,1,1…”
Section: 16)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then the product Theorem 3.5 (ii) and Proposition 3.6 (iii) imply that the kernel (2) ν(y) belongs to the class K n−1,n,1 (∂Ω × ∂Ω). By the imbedding Proposition 3.7 (ii) with…”
Section: Lemma 42 Let N ∈ N\{0 1} a Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then one can prove the following formula for the kernel of the double layer potential B * Ω,y (S a (x − y)) = −DS a (x − y)a (2) ν(y) − ν t (y)a (1) S a (x − y) In particular, the kernel B * Ω,y (S a (x − y)) belongs to K ,(∂Ω)×(∂Ω) for all ∈]0, +∞[.…”
Section: Lemma 42 Let N ∈ N\{0 1} a Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n} is the canonical basis of R n . We note that the matrix a (2) is symmetric. Then we assume that a ∈ C N2 satisfies the following ellipticity assumption inf…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case n ≥ 2, m ≥ 2, α ∈]0, 1], O. Chkadua [2] has pointed out that one could exploit Kupradze, Gegelia, Basheleishvili and Burchuladze [22, Chap. IV, Sect.…”
We prove the validity of regularizing properties of the boundary integral operator corresponding to the double layer potential associated to the fundamental solution of a nonhomogeneous second order elliptic differential operator with constant coefficients in Hölder spaces by exploiting an estimate on the maximal function of the tangential gradient with respect to the first variable of the kernel of the double layer potential and by exploiting specific imbedding and multiplication properties in certain classes of kernels of integral operators and a generalization of a result for integral operators on differentiable manifolds.
“…We now consider the seventh addendum in the right hand side of formula (4.10). Since B 1 is analytic, Lemma 4.5 (ii) and the product Proposition 3.6 (iii) imply that DB 1 (x − y)a (2) ν(y) belongs to K 0,1,1…”
Section: 16)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Then the product Theorem 3.5 (ii) and Proposition 3.6 (iii) imply that the kernel (2) ν(y) belongs to the class K n−1,n,1 (∂Ω × ∂Ω). By the imbedding Proposition 3.7 (ii) with…”
Section: Lemma 42 Let N ∈ N\{0 1} a Functionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Then one can prove the following formula for the kernel of the double layer potential B * Ω,y (S a (x − y)) = −DS a (x − y)a (2) ν(y) − ν t (y)a (1) S a (x − y) In particular, the kernel B * Ω,y (S a (x − y)) belongs to K ,(∂Ω)×(∂Ω) for all ∈]0, +∞[.…”
Section: Lemma 42 Let N ∈ N\{0 1} a Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, n} is the canonical basis of R n . We note that the matrix a (2) is symmetric. Then we assume that a ∈ C N2 satisfies the following ellipticity assumption inf…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case n ≥ 2, m ≥ 2, α ∈]0, 1], O. Chkadua [2] has pointed out that one could exploit Kupradze, Gegelia, Basheleishvili and Burchuladze [22, Chap. IV, Sect.…”
We prove the validity of regularizing properties of the boundary integral operator corresponding to the double layer potential associated to the fundamental solution of a nonhomogeneous second order elliptic differential operator with constant coefficients in Hölder spaces by exploiting an estimate on the maximal function of the tangential gradient with respect to the first variable of the kernel of the double layer potential and by exploiting specific imbedding and multiplication properties in certain classes of kernels of integral operators and a generalization of a result for integral operators on differentiable manifolds.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.