1996
DOI: 10.1021/ed073p1150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical SAT Test Scores and College Chemistry Grades

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…R 2 ) in the posttest-2 scores is explained by the SAT scores. These results support the previous findings of a positive relationship between SAT scores and chemistry performance (Ozsogomonyan & Loftus, 1979;Spencer, 1996). This exploratory data analysis suggests that posttest-2 performance is related to gender, with males having the advantage (r=.49, p=.001), even with the presence of a male outlier score (28) nearly three standard deviations below the male mean score (mean=78; SD=17) (see Figure 14[B]).…”
Section: Background Experience: Satsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…R 2 ) in the posttest-2 scores is explained by the SAT scores. These results support the previous findings of a positive relationship between SAT scores and chemistry performance (Ozsogomonyan & Loftus, 1979;Spencer, 1996). This exploratory data analysis suggests that posttest-2 performance is related to gender, with males having the advantage (r=.49, p=.001), even with the presence of a male outlier score (28) nearly three standard deviations below the male mean score (mean=78; SD=17) (see Figure 14[B]).…”
Section: Background Experience: Satsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Prior knowledge and gender have both been associated with chemistry performance (Boli, Allen, & Payne, 1985;Ozsogomonyan & Loftus, 1979;Shibley, Milakofsky, Bender, & Patterson, 2003;Spencer, 1996). Therefore the composition of the two treatment groups was checked with regard to indicators of the volunteers' prior knowledge (participation in AP or other advanced chemistry coursework and performance on the SAT) and gender.…”
Section: Influence Of Background Experiences and Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the quantitative nature of general chemistry, it has been shown that math preparedness plays a large role in success in this course [14]. Strategies to determine which students may be mathematically underprepared for general chemistry have been based on high school GPA, standardized college admission tests such as ACT and SAT exams, and chemistry placement exams that are usually administered online [10,13,15,24].…”
Section: Identifying Mathematically Underprepared Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many strategies have been employed to identify underprepared students in order to provide them adequate preparation prior to entering rigorous STEM major course work. Chemistry placement exams [13], Math course placement [14], ACT/SAT college entrance exam scores [13][14][15], high school grade point average (GPA) [13], and other types of identifiers [10] have been utilized to gain insight into academic preparation and make predictions about future success in general chemistry. The Toledo Placement exam is a nationally normed chemistry placement exam offered by the American Chemical Society Exams Institute that has been shown to be an effective mechanism for identifying academic preparation predictive of success in first semester general chemistry coursework [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further factors mentioned in the literature that may help identify students at risk of failing include: first year experience at the university (Krause et al, 2005), the ability to adapt to the university environment (McInnis, James and Hartley, 2000;Peat, Dalziel and Grant, 2001) or pre-semester tests (Spencer, 1996). Study skills have also been found to influence academic performance, but they only account for a small amount of variance in the GPA.…”
Section: Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%