1982
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4684-0136-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical Techniques in Crystallography and Materials Science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
270
0
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
270
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Three cycles of full-matrix least-squares refinement (on F) with unit weights, isotropic temperature factors son, 1970) were included in subsequent cycles. In the final stages of robust/resistant refinement (Prince, 1982), each reflection was given a weight computed from a Chebyshev series with three parameters 45.3, -50.7, 25.9 (Carruthers & Watkin, 1979). This weighting scheme resulted in the down-weighting of one reflection (888); in the final listing 10Fo(888)= 3470, 10Fc(888) = 3877.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three cycles of full-matrix least-squares refinement (on F) with unit weights, isotropic temperature factors son, 1970) were included in subsequent cycles. In the final stages of robust/resistant refinement (Prince, 1982), each reflection was given a weight computed from a Chebyshev series with three parameters 45.3, -50.7, 25.9 (Carruthers & Watkin, 1979). This weighting scheme resulted in the down-weighting of one reflection (888); in the final listing 10Fo(888)= 3470, 10Fc(888) = 3877.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inclusion of any weaker reflections failed to decrease errors or help correlation problems and resulted only in an artificially high R factor. The function minimized was r~o(IFol -IFcl) 2, where the weights were calculated using a robust/resistant weighting scheme (Prince, 1982). A separate refinement was also carried out against Fo 2, but this refinement showed no significant differences and on this occasion a better convergence was achieved when the refinement was carried out against Fo.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Refinement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separate refinement was also carried out against Fo 2, but this refinement showed no significant differences and on this occasion a better convergence was achieved when the refinement was carried out against Fo. (Prince, 1982), three parameters: 19.9, -20.1, 15.0 0.0001 3.4 -4.1 Larson (1970) 8.7 (6) Source of atomic scattering factors International Tables for X-ray Crystallography (1974, Vol. IV) physically unreasonable or did not converge back to their original positions when shifted away.)…”
Section: Data Analysis and Refinement Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because Vy is positive definite, its Cholesky factor, a lower triangular matrix, L, such that Vy = LL r, exists (Prince, 1994), and the difference matrix V x -V~ can be written in the form…”
Section: Least-squares Fittingmentioning
confidence: 99%