2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11858-016-0777-9
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematical working space and paradigms as an analysis tool for the teaching and learning of analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the first research question, the results indicate that the majority of authors of the studies reviewed are from Chile, Spain, France, or Mexico. In this sense, it should be mentioned that participation in joint international projects (e.g., French-Chilean ECOS-Sud C13H03 project) have contributed to developing and deepening understanding of important theoretical aspects of MWS (e.g., Montoya-Delgadillo & Vivier, 2016). Also, proceedings of MWS Symposium and issues dedicated to theory in prestigious mathematics education journals have had a strong impact on number of documents found and analyzed in this review.…”
Section: Links/connections With Other Theories or Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding the first research question, the results indicate that the majority of authors of the studies reviewed are from Chile, Spain, France, or Mexico. In this sense, it should be mentioned that participation in joint international projects (e.g., French-Chilean ECOS-Sud C13H03 project) have contributed to developing and deepening understanding of important theoretical aspects of MWS (e.g., Montoya-Delgadillo & Vivier, 2016). Also, proceedings of MWS Symposium and issues dedicated to theory in prestigious mathematics education journals have had a strong impact on number of documents found and analyzed in this review.…”
Section: Links/connections With Other Theories or Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…MWS theory considers the epistemological principles of the objects that are studied within a mathematical domain (e.g., geometry and probability) (Kuzniak, 2011;Montoya-Delgadillo & Vivier, 2016). Likewise, the theory integrates the human (or social) component, which entails considering a cognitive dimension related to the epistemological dimension (Kuzniak, 2022).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Mathematical Working Spacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we consider the paradigms of real analysis (Montoya-Delgadillo & Vivier, 2016), which guide the mathematical work in this field. In particular, the arithmetic/geometric analysis (GA) paradigm involves work of a perceptual type based on interpretations arising from graphs or numbers, taking into account the role of the figures or different visualisations that activate that work.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…En esta investigación, para analizar el trabajo matemático del profesor se utiliza el marco del Espacio De Trabajo Matemático (ETM) (Kuzniak, 2011), concebido como un modelo que contribuye a la comprensión del trabajo de personas (profesor, estudiante o un matemático) que resuelven tareas matemáticas y permite caracterizar los caminos que emergen en su resolución (Kuzniak et al, 2016;Henríquez-Rivas y Montoya-Delgadillo, 2015). 39-2 (2021), 123-142 La investigación en ETM considera los principios epistemológicos de los objetos que se estudian dentro de un dominio matemático (como la geometría, el análisis o la probabilidad) (Kuzniak, 2011;Montoya-Delgadillo y Vivier, 2016). En este marco se diferencian dos tipos de elementos (representados por los planos epistemológico y cognitivo, en la figura 1), que pretenden captar los contenidos matemáticos del dominio estudiado y la actividad cognitiva del individuo cuando adquiere, desarrolla o utiliza esos contenidos matemáticos (Kuzniak, 2011).…”
Section: Espacios De Trabajo Matemáticounclassified