1979
DOI: 10.2307/3800632
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics and Mallard Management

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Great Lakes, the estimated renesting probability was 50% (Claassen et al 2014); however, we didn't have renesting probabilities for our population. We used the following equation for female success (FS) to account for nesting attempts following nest failure (Cowardin and Johnson 1979 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the Great Lakes, the estimated renesting probability was 50% (Claassen et al 2014); however, we didn't have renesting probabilities for our population. We used the following equation for female success (FS) to account for nesting attempts following nest failure (Cowardin and Johnson 1979 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nest survival, as an index of productivity, does not account either for nesting attempts following a failure (renesting) or for repeated nesting after raising a brood (double brooding; Grzybowski and Pease 2005). For waterfowl, Cowardin and Johnson (1979) and Johnson et al (1992) illustrated the relationship between nest survival and the success of an entire breeding season. For songbirds, nest survival alone may not be an accurate index to fecundity in some situations.…”
Section: Reviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measurement of brood survival is essential for calculating recruitment from nesting data (Cowardin and Johnson 1979). Yet, survival and mortality patterns during the prefledging period are poorly understood.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%