2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10857-020-09483-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mathematics teacher educator noticing: examining interpretations and evidence of students’ thinking

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings of this research may have important implications for teacher training faculty and the authorities that define training curricula since when implementing guidelines linked to the use of technologies, teaching staff must be able to reflect on what happens when they are introduced. The results of this investigation show that it is not enough to study the domains and subdomains of the TPACK model, but that there must be a detailed study of mathematical education models that consistently complement what the PSMT can interpret and the way she can link her perceptions with explicit evidence (Amador, 2022). Some open questions arise from this investigation that will need to be addressed in future studies, as it appears that this type of activity can create links and connections between research and practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The findings of this research may have important implications for teacher training faculty and the authorities that define training curricula since when implementing guidelines linked to the use of technologies, teaching staff must be able to reflect on what happens when they are introduced. The results of this investigation show that it is not enough to study the domains and subdomains of the TPACK model, but that there must be a detailed study of mathematical education models that consistently complement what the PSMT can interpret and the way she can link her perceptions with explicit evidence (Amador, 2022). Some open questions arise from this investigation that will need to be addressed in future studies, as it appears that this type of activity can create links and connections between research and practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Experienced SMTs, on the other hand, have been determined to suggest more content-specific instructional applications based on student thinking. Teachers' focus on interpretation and evidence provides a basis for making instructional decisions (Amador, 2021). In addition, data analysis reveals that experienced teachers tend to make student-centered instructional decisions when they make content-specific inferences about the observation evidence of SMTs, especially those who have graduate education and attend professional development courses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A holistic view of the researches shows that experienced teachers need to develop noticing skills in the context of making productive comments based on student thinking and presenting instructional suggestions. As documented by a number of studies, the skill of noticing is not a skill that can only be developed through teaching experience, it is a skill that can be learned with support (e.g, Amador, 2021;Jacobs et al, 2020;van Es & Sherin, 2010). The current study was conducted with mathematics teachers with different professional experiences.…”
Section: Noticing Based On Professional Experiencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many would argue they provided an influential characterization for noticing, with their definition of professional noticing of children's mathematical thinking as the inclusion of three subskills: attending, interpreting, and deciding to respond. We recognize their contribution to the conceptual ideas of noticing, yet due to their framework with three scales of lacking, limited, and robust that has been used widely to analyze noticing data (Amador, 2022; Dick, 2017; Jacobs & Spangler, 2017; Schack et al, 2017), we decided their work will be included in our examination of frameworks (not in the current paper of conceptualizations) because of the prominence of their framework as an analytic tool in other research. Again, we recognize that Jacobs et al's (2010) work, as well as others (van Es & Sherin, 2008), include elements that clearly define noticing as well as frameworks that are specific to analysis; we have reserved these for future reporting on frameworks.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%