2022
DOI: 10.3390/ani12212908
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mating Conditions and Management Practices Influence Pregnancy Scanning Outcomes Differently between Ewe Breeds

Abstract: Sheep production in southern Australia may vary by breed, time of year, production output (wool, meat, or both), region and seasonal influence. Sheep producers with flocks of approximately 300–500 ewes (n = 58) were recruited across southern Australia to take part in a survey and mating variables were collected from over 30,000 ewes between October 2020 and August 2021. A Bayesian Network (BN) was developed to identify the interrelatedness and most influential variable on pregnancy and fetal number (of pregnan… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a survey of Victorian farms, Armstrong, et al 7 found variation between breeds and seasons of mating for reproduction rate, ranging between 116% and 144%. Most recently, Bates, et al 27 reported on 29,157 naturally mated ewes, including four breeds, three seasons and located across 58 farms across southern Australia. In that study, the average pregnancy rate was 90% and reproduction rate was 140%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a survey of Victorian farms, Armstrong, et al 7 found variation between breeds and seasons of mating for reproduction rate, ranging between 116% and 144%. Most recently, Bates, et al 27 reported on 29,157 naturally mated ewes, including four breeds, three seasons and located across 58 farms across southern Australia. In that study, the average pregnancy rate was 90% and reproduction rate was 140%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sheep producers were recruited through professional networks by the New South Wales (NSW) Department of Primary Industries (DPI) for a broader study [18] in accordance with the Charles Sturt University Human Ethics Committee (protocol number H21037). The producers managing these sheep flocks were the target population and participants/respondents of the cross-sectional study.…”
Section: Study Area Participants and Survey Designmentioning
confidence: 99%