2023
DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.18.529053
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matreex: compact and interactive visualisation for scalable studies of large gene families

Abstract: Studying gene family evolution strongly benefits from insightful visualisations. However, the ever-growing number of sequenced genomes is leading to increasingly larger gene families, which challenges existing gene tree visualisations. Indeed, most of them present users with a dilemma: display complete but intractable gene trees, or collapse subtrees, thereby hiding their children information. Here, we introduce Matreex, a new dynamic tool to scale-up the visualisation of gene families. Matreex key idea is to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are available bioinformatic tools for this purpose (Huerta-Cepas et al, 2016; Revell, 2012; Stamatakis, 2014; Suchard et al, 2018; Sukumaran & Holder, 2010), but they all demand programming skills and ad hoc implementations. Other tools have been developed that provide more straightforward and user-friendly interfaces, but they are usually restricted to specific scenarios such as profiling orthologous groups (e.g., eggNOG (Hernández-Plaza et al, 2022), Matreex (Rossier et al, 2023), PhyloProfile (Tran et al, 2018)), domain architectures (e.g., PhyloPro2.0 (Cromar et al, 2016)) or metagenomics profiling (e.g., Graphlan (Asnicar et al, 2015), TAMPA (Sarwal et al, 2023)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are available bioinformatic tools for this purpose (Huerta-Cepas et al, 2016; Revell, 2012; Stamatakis, 2014; Suchard et al, 2018; Sukumaran & Holder, 2010), but they all demand programming skills and ad hoc implementations. Other tools have been developed that provide more straightforward and user-friendly interfaces, but they are usually restricted to specific scenarios such as profiling orthologous groups (e.g., eggNOG (Hernández-Plaza et al, 2022), Matreex (Rossier et al, 2023), PhyloProfile (Tran et al, 2018)), domain architectures (e.g., PhyloPro2.0 (Cromar et al, 2016)) or metagenomics profiling (e.g., Graphlan (Asnicar et al, 2015), TAMPA (Sarwal et al, 2023)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%