Operator Theory and Complex Analysis 1992
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8606-2_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matricial Coupling and Equivalence After Extension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
68
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
68
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(a) Due to the last two results, L and T are toplinear equivalent (i.e., they coincide up to composition with boundedly invertible operators) [1],…”
Section: Theorem 23 ([6]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(a) Due to the last two results, L and T are toplinear equivalent (i.e., they coincide up to composition with boundedly invertible operators) [1],…”
Section: Theorem 23 ([6]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vol. 56 (2006) Mixed Boundary Value Problems for the Helmholtz Equation 3 All considerations will be carried out for BVPs of normal type 1 where the so-called pre-symbol σ 1 of B 1 satisfies…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3.21) In the asymmetric case, it is a consequence of the formula (3.11), which can be regarded as a direct generalization of (3.21). At the end, the second (necessity) part of Theorem 3.8 is not so evident, particularly the construction of a coupling relation from an equivalence after extension relation, see [4]. However the conclusion that is most important in our applications can be proved independently and more directly as follows.…”
Section: Theorem 38 (Bart-tsekanovsky 1991) Let S and T Be Bounded mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the present section, we would like to go a little further and prove that, under some not very restrictive conditions, W Φ,Ω is equivalent after extension [1] to W Ψ,R+ . I.e., more than in (2.1), we can choose E 1 and F 1 to be bounded invertible.…”
Section: Relations With Wiener-hopf Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, it is not sufficient to suppose that only one of the operators is generalized invertible or to replace this by the closedness of the images, see [1,Example 6].…”
Section: Remark 22mentioning
confidence: 99%