2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.07.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matriderm® versus Integra®: A comparative experimental study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
62
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Acellular dermal templates such as IntegraDRT ® , used in combination with split thickness skin transplants, have brought about certain improvements regarding long-term functional and cosmetic results, but this treatment requires a two-step, staged procedure (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acellular dermal templates such as IntegraDRT ® , used in combination with split thickness skin transplants, have brought about certain improvements regarding long-term functional and cosmetic results, but this treatment requires a two-step, staged procedure (6)(7)(8).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schneider demostró que a nivel experimental no existían diferencias en cuanto a la cantidad de dermis obtenida con estas matrices al comparar una lámina bicapa con otra lámina monocapa, en concreto, Integra® contra Matriderm®. Además, tampoco se objetivaron diferencias en la tasa de prendimiento de los injertos sobre los sustitutos dérmicos (12).…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…Sin embargo, se ha observado que la presencia de láminas de colágeno de 1mm de espesor no retrasa el prendimiento del injerto y no aumenta la tasa de reintervención para conseguir la cobertura (11). La aplicación de Matriderm® de 1 mm ha demostrado tener la misma tasa de prendimiento de los injertos, sin encontrar diferencias estadísticas en cuanto al espesor de dermis lograda cuando se compara con Integra® bicapa de 3 mm (12).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Immunoincompetent female nu/nu rats, 8-10 weeks old (Harlan Laboratories, Venray, Netherlands), were prepared and anesthetized as described by Schneider et al 18 Skin analogs [containing palmar (n = 18) and nonpalmar (n = 9) fibroblast] were transplanted onto full-thickness skin defects created surgically on the backs of animals. Wound closure from surrounding rat skin was prevented and the skin substitutes were protected by surgical steel rings (26 mm in diameter) sutured to the skin defects using nonabsorbable polyester sutures (Ethibond Ò ; Ethicon, Zug, Zurich).…”
Section: Transplantation Of Dessmentioning
confidence: 99%