2023
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrilineal phylogeny and habitat suitability of the endangered spotted pond turtle (Geoclemys hamiltonii; Testudines: Geoemydidae): a two-dimensional approach to forecasting future conservation consequences

Shantanu Kundu,
Tanoy Mukherjee,
Manokaran Kamalakannan
et al.

Abstract: The spotted pond turtle (Geoclemys hamiltonii) is a threatened and less explored species endemic to Bangladesh, India, Nepal, and Pakistan. To infer structural variation and matrilineal phylogenetic interpretation, the present research decoded the mitogenome of G. hamiltonii (16,509 bp) using next-generation sequencing technology. The mitogenome comprises 13 protein-coding genes (PCGs), 22 transfer RNAs (tRNAs), two ribosomal RNAs (rRNAs), and one AT-rich control region (CR) with similar strand symmetry in ver… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Model evaluation relied on the area under the curve statistics (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve [ 56 ]. AUC test values ranging from 0 to 1 were interpreted, where values below 0.5 indicated deficient power, 0.5 suggested random prediction, 0.7–0.8 were considered acceptable, 0.8–0.9 deemed excellent, and >0.9 regarded as exceptional model performance [ 40 , 57 , 58 ]. Furthermore, the true skill statistic (TSS) score for the present model was assessed for validation [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Model evaluation relied on the area under the curve statistics (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve [ 56 ]. AUC test values ranging from 0 to 1 were interpreted, where values below 0.5 indicated deficient power, 0.5 suggested random prediction, 0.7–0.8 were considered acceptable, 0.8–0.9 deemed excellent, and >0.9 regarded as exceptional model performance [ 40 , 57 , 58 ]. Furthermore, the true skill statistic (TSS) score for the present model was assessed for validation [ 59 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for a more detailed characterization of landscape attributes and enables a comprehensive analysis throughout the distribution range of the species [ 61 ]. They were utilized as indicators to assess habitat characteristics and the degree of fragmentation in the modeled area under current and climate change scenarios [ 40 ]. A qualitative evaluation of the habitat ranges was conducted by calculating zonal statistics within the boundaries of protected areas (PAs) across their distribution range in present and future scenarios [ 62 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation