Matrix Diffusion Effects on Contaminant Migration from an Injection Well in Fractured Sandstone

Abstract

Deep‐well injection into fractured sandstone is an option for the disposal of contaminated mine dewatering discharge from an open pit uranium mine. As part of the assessment of potential contaminant migration from deep‐well injection, the effect of matrix diffusion was evaluated. An analytical mathematical model was developed for the simulation of the radial movement of a contaminant front away from an injection point under steady flow conditions in a planar fracture with uniform properties. The model includes the effects of advection in the fracture, diffusion of contaminants from the fracture into the rock matrix, and equilibrium adsorption on the fracture surface as well as in the rock matrix. Effective diffusion coefficients obtained from laboratory experiments on 11 intact core samples varied from 3.4 × 10−8 to 3.2 × 10−7 cm2/s. Model simulations were made with diffusion coefficient values in this range and with single‐fracture injection rates estimated from fracture frequencies in boreholes, and from bulk hydraulic conductivity values obtained from field tests. Because of matrix diffusion, the rate of outward movement of the front of the nonreactive contaminants from the injection well is much slower than the rate of water flow in the fractures. Simulations of the movement of contaminants that undergo adsorption indicate that even a small distribution coefficient for the rock matrix causes the contaminants to remain very close to the injection well during the one‐year period. The results of the simplified model demonstrate that matrix diffusion is an important process that cannot be neglected in the assessment of a waste disposal scheme located in fractured porous rock. However, in order to make a definitive assessment of the capability of matrix diffusion and associated matrix adsorption to significantly limit the extent of contaminant migration around injection wells, it would be necessary to conduct field tests such as a preliminary or experimental injection.

A Simple Analytical Model for Interpretation of Tracer Tests in Two-Domain Subsurface Flow Systems

“…There are several mathematical definitions of R a in the literature (Lever et al 1983;Feenstra et al 1984;Maloszewski and Zuber 1993) of which Equation 4 is consistent with the formulation of Equation 3 (e.g., Younger 1990, developed from expressions given by Lever et al 1983):…”

Investigations on Diffusion Characteristics of Granite and Chalk Rock Mass

“…However, either of these tests would yield the apparent diffusion coefficient by describing the concentration development in the reservoir with an appropriate solution of Fick's 2nd law (Crank, 1975). In throughdiffusion experiments (Feenstra et al, 1984), the diffusive flux is observed between a reservoir cell with high concentration across a porous rock sample and a receiving cell with an initial concentration of zero. The analytical solution of Fick's 2nd law for through-diffusion experiments, outlined below, yields the effective diffusion coefficient and the capacity factor of the rock sample, and hence also the apparent diffusion coefficient (using Equation 7).…”

Corrective Action Investigation Plan for Corrective Action Unit 98: Frenchman Flat, Nevada Test Site, Nevada (Revision 1)

“…In modeling diffusion of strontium and plutonium in fractured granite, Krishnamoorthy et al (1992) chose a range of values from 4.8 x 10 -7 to 1.9 x 10 -6 cm 2 /s (5.2 x 10 -10 to 2.1 x 10 -9 ft 2 /s). Feenstra et al (1984) measured diffusion through intact sandstone cores and obtained a range of values from 3.4 x 10 -8 to 3.2 x 10 -7 cm 2 /s (3.7 x 10 -11 to 3.4 x 10 -10 ft 2 /s) with a mean of 1.5 x 10-7 cm 2 /s (1.6 x 10 -10 ft 2 /s). In mudstone, Barone et al (1992) measured a diffusion coefficient of 1.5 x 10 -6 to 2.0 x 10 -6 cm 2 /s (1.6 x 10 -9 to 2.2 x 10 -9 ft 2 /s).…”