2018
DOI: 10.20944/preprints201803.0056.v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix Methods for Solving Hartree-Fock Equations in Atomic Structure Calculations and Line Broadening

Abstract: Atomic structure of N-electron atoms is often determined using the Hartree-Fock method, which is an integro-differential equation. The exchange term of the Hartree-Fock equations is usually treated as an inhomogeneous term of a differential equation, or with a local density approximation. This work uses matrix methods to solve for the Hartree-Fock equations, rather than the more commonly-used shooting method to integrate an inhomogeneous differential equation. It is well known that a derivative operator can be… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, uncertainties in Mg K-shell spectra obscure true data-model discrepancies in the Fe-opacity experiment [3,4]. Additionally, opacities in stellar atmospheres and interiors may be underestimated due to inaccuracies in the broadening of the Lyα lines of hydrogen [5] and oxygen [6], respectively. Underestimates of the opacities can impact the accuracy of model spectra of stars and the location of the solar convection zone [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, uncertainties in Mg K-shell spectra obscure true data-model discrepancies in the Fe-opacity experiment [3,4]. Additionally, opacities in stellar atmospheres and interiors may be underestimated due to inaccuracies in the broadening of the Lyα lines of hydrogen [5] and oxygen [6], respectively. Underestimates of the opacities can impact the accuracy of model spectra of stars and the location of the solar convection zone [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%