2001
DOI: 10.1007/pl00004226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matrix-Product Codes over ? q

Abstract: Codes C 1 , . . . , C M of length n over F q and an M × N matrix A over F q define a matrix-product codeWe study matrix-product codes using Linear Algebra. This provides a basis for a unified analysis of |C|, d(C), the minimum Hamming distance of C, and C ⊥ . It also reveals an interesting connection with MDS codes. We determine |C| when A is non-singular. To underbound d(C), we need A to be 'non-singular by columns (NSC)'. We investigate NSC matrices. We show that Generalized Reed-Muller codes are iterative N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
94
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
94
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We remark that this property also holds for the other constructions we study in this paper, but only when the C i 's are nested. Finally, we also study the squares of a matrix-product construction from [2] where we can apply the same proof techniques as we have in the other constructions.…”
Section: Results and Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We remark that this property also holds for the other constructions we study in this paper, but only when the C i 's are nested. Finally, we also study the squares of a matrix-product construction from [2] where we can apply the same proof techniques as we have in the other constructions.…”
Section: Results and Outlinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall the definition and basic properties of matrix-product codes (following [2]) and squares of codes. We call A = [a ij ] i=1,...,s,j=1,...,l the defining matrix and the C i 's the constituent codes.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a 1 = 0, then a 2 ̸ = 0, and hence µ α (k) = µ α (b n a 2 ) ≥ n + µ α (a 2 ) ≥ n + ρ α (D (2) n ) ≥ n + ⌊β 2 n⌋ − t 2 + 1. 2.…”
Section: A Double M-constructionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Theorem 3.4 (Propagation Rule 10). Let P 1 be a (t 1 , α 1 , β 1 , n, m, s)-net in base b with dual set D (1) n and P 2 be a (t 2 , α 2 , β 2 , n, m, s)-net in base b with dual set D (2) n . Let d = d(D (1) n , D (2) n ).…”
Section: A Double M-constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation