2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2010.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matroid base polytope decomposition

Abstract: Let P (M) be the matroid base polytope of a matroid M. A matroid base polytope decomposition of P (M) is a decomposition of the formis also a matroid base polytope for some matroid M i , and for each 1In this paper, we investigate hyperplane splits, that is, polytope decompositions when t = 2. We give sufficient conditions for M so P (M) has a hyperplane split and characterize when P (M 1 ⊕ M 2 ) has a hyperplane split where M 1 ⊕ M 2 denote the direct sum of matroids M 1 and M 2 . We also prove that P (M) has… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper is a continuation of the paper [3] by the two present authors. For general background in matroid theory we refer the reader to [13,16] where e i is the i th standard basis vector in R n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper is a continuation of the paper [3] by the two present authors. For general background in matroid theory we refer the reader to [13,16] where e i is the i th standard basis vector in R n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Matroid base polytope decomposition were introduced by Lafforgue [10,11] and have appeared in many different contexts : quasisymmetric functions [1,2,4,12], compactification of the moduli space of hyperplane arrangements [6,8], tropical linear spaces [14,15], etc. In [3], we have studied the existence (and nonexistence) of such decompositions. Among other results, we presented sufficient conditions on a matroid M so P (M ) admits a hyperplane split.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…st(U ) = (1, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 0) P = {4, 5, 9, 10, 13} st(P ) = (0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 0, 1, 1, 0, 0, 1) L = {5, 8, 10, 12, 13} st(L) = (0, 0, 0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 1) Figure 1. Left: Lattice paths U and L from (0, 0) to (8,5) and a path P staying between U and L in the diagram of M [U, L]. Right: Representations of U , L, and P as subsets of {1, .…”
Section: Lattice Path Matroidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The class of lattice path matroids was first introduced by Bonin, de Mier, and Noy [5]. Many different aspects of lattice path matroids have been studied: excluded minor results [4], algebraic geometry notions [12,23,24], the Tutte polynomial [6,18,19], the associated basis polytope in connection with the combinatorics of Bergman complexes [12], its facial structure [1,2], specific decompositions in relation with Lafforgue's work [8] as well as the related cut-set expansion conjecture [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section we address the class of lattice path matroids first introduced by Bonin, de Mier, and Noy [4]. Many different aspects of lattice path matroids have been studied: excluded minor results [2], algebraic geometry notions [9,17,18], complexity of computing the Tutte polynomial [5,15], and results around the matroid base polytope [6].…”
Section: Lattice Path Matroids and Snakesmentioning
confidence: 99%