1976
DOI: 10.1086/154525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matter in superstrong magnetic fields and the structure of a neutron star's surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic explanation for the subpulse drifting phenomenon was given by Ruderman & Sutherland (1975). Although their fundamental assumption, regarding the ion work functions, is no longer accepted (Michel 1974; Hillebrandt & Muller 1976; Fawley, Arons & Scharlemann 1977), later modifications (Cheng & Ruderman 1977a,b, 1980) have retained the explanation for drifting. Cheng & Ruderman (1977b) invoke hotspots on the polar cap to explain the cessation of drifts during nulls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic explanation for the subpulse drifting phenomenon was given by Ruderman & Sutherland (1975). Although their fundamental assumption, regarding the ion work functions, is no longer accepted (Michel 1974; Hillebrandt & Muller 1976; Fawley, Arons & Scharlemann 1977), later modifications (Cheng & Ruderman 1977a,b, 1980) have retained the explanation for drifting. Cheng & Ruderman (1977b) invoke hotspots on the polar cap to explain the cessation of drifts during nulls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the stationary models, the inertial potential drop is not large enough to explain the entire population of observed pulsars. The gap models seem to account more naturally for characteristics of pulsar radio emission, but they face fundamental problems, principally the binding energy associated with gap formation itself (Hillebrands & Muller 1976 ;Flower et al 1977 ;Kossl et al 1988). Recently, the common conclusion that electron-positron pairs with high densities exist close to the neutron star has been questioned by several authors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process cascades into a spark of e + -e − pair plasma, which eventually produces the observed coherent microwave radio radiation. However the model requires a high work function of iron ions on the surface of the neutron star, which was later calculated to be too low (Hillebrandt & Mueller 1976;Flowers et al 1977). Cheng & Ruderman (1980, and references therein) salvaged the model by invoking e + -e − pair production by thermal X-ray photons, emitted by the hot neutron star surface, in the Coulomb field of relativistic iron ions that are no longer bound to the neutron star surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%