2006
DOI: 10.1108/17511340610670151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matters for judgement: some thoughts on method in management history

Abstract: Paper Type: ConceptualPurpose: This paper reflects on some aspects of method in management history and the importance of the self-reflection on their world-view that must accompany authors' endeavours, in order to be articulated in the matters they proffer for the reader's judgement. Approach:Drawing on the insights proffered by Evans (1999:1) about how to study, research, write about and read history, this paper offers some thoughts on the importance of giving due consideration to method in management history… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is recommended that those conducting historical case research should clearly specify the assumptions underlying the approach, as investigations using historical cases can take many forms (Lamond, 2006). Explicitly stating the underlying assumptions that support the ontological and epistemological views of the researchers is essential (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007) so that readers can determine the plausibility (Weick, 1989) and persuasiveness (Siggelkow, 2007) of the implications and findings derived from the research.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Logic and Historical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is recommended that those conducting historical case research should clearly specify the assumptions underlying the approach, as investigations using historical cases can take many forms (Lamond, 2006). Explicitly stating the underlying assumptions that support the ontological and epistemological views of the researchers is essential (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007) so that readers can determine the plausibility (Weick, 1989) and persuasiveness (Siggelkow, 2007) of the implications and findings derived from the research.…”
Section: Assumptions Of Logic and Historical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That means studying the historical event to be cited with some care and not hastily or superficially (Lamond, 2006). In studying a topic in-depth, management scholars and other social scientists are likely to make heavy use of secondary studies for their work.…”
Section: Implications For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The retail industry was worth £295bn in 2009 of which £150bn was accountable to grocery multiples (IGD, 2010 Reviews of the grocery multiple sector by the Competition Commission (2003;2006; have referred to unfair pressure on suppliers and the growing dominance of the oligopolistic group (Bevan, 2005). But at the same time, Wal-Mart (1999) was allowed to takeover Asda which in turn took over Netto (2010), while Morrisons was the preferred bidder for Safeway (2004).…”
Section: Uk Retail Industry Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data collection is from secondary sources (see Table III) where exegesis of the written word leads to explanation (Lamond, 2006). The categorisation of strategic actions emerges based on common themes and patterns from within the sources, which is iteratively fine-tuned.…”
Section: Towards a Holistic Understanding Of Csrmentioning
confidence: 99%