2018
DOI: 10.1080/15710882.2018.1557694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matters of concerns and user stories: ontological and methodological considerations for collaborative design processes

Abstract: In this article, we lever on matters of concern (MoC) as a way to reflect on the articulation of collaborative design processes. We do this by focusing on an international project for the development of an ICT platform for energy management at the household and housing cooperative levels. We analyse retrospectively how the project development process captured and accompanied several MoC in two piloting areas, where all authors were directly involved. Our work contributes to the body of knowledge that builds on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We based our Co-D approach on the Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre's framework (Hagen et al, 2012). Co-D processes involved personas, scenarios and user stories (Kankainen et al, 2012), identification and discussion of Matters of Concern (Poderi et al, 2018) including consideration of evidence, guidelines and resources (Supplementary Materials A Tables 1-2), artefacts (e.g., visual maps), functionality, user journeys and user testing (see Appendix B for multiple examples).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We based our Co-D approach on the Young and Well Cooperative Research Centre's framework (Hagen et al, 2012). Co-D processes involved personas, scenarios and user stories (Kankainen et al, 2012), identification and discussion of Matters of Concern (Poderi et al, 2018) including consideration of evidence, guidelines and resources (Supplementary Materials A Tables 1-2), artefacts (e.g., visual maps), functionality, user journeys and user testing (see Appendix B for multiple examples).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%