2008
DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/4/1/015005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturation of osteoblast-like SaoS2 induced by carbon nanotubes

Abstract: Osteogenic maturation of the osteoblast is crucial for bone formation. In this study, multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) and graphite (GP) were pressed as compacts. The greater ability of carbon nanotubes to adsorb proteins, compared with graphite, was shown. Human osteoblast-like SaoS2 cells were cultured and the cell response to the two kinds of compacts was compared in vitro. Meanwhile, we used cell culture on the culture plate as a control. Assays for osteonectin, osteopontin and osteocalcin gene expre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
62
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
5
62
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar response was found in human osteosarcoma SaOs-2 cells, which attached and proliferated much worse on graphite than on single-and multi-walled carbon nanotube films . In addition, SaOs-2 cells cultured on graphite showed a lower expression of osteonectin, osteopontin and osteocalcin, i.e., markers of osteogenic cell differentiation, and a lower content of alkaline phosphatase and total protein after pre-soaking both graphite and nanotube compacts in the culture medium with BMP-2 (Li et al, 2009b). In our earlier studies, graphite was prepared by pyrolysis, i.e., by a process defined as thermochemical decomposition of organic material at elevated temperatures (above 430 °C) in the absence of oxygen.…”
Section: Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A similar response was found in human osteosarcoma SaOs-2 cells, which attached and proliferated much worse on graphite than on single-and multi-walled carbon nanotube films . In addition, SaOs-2 cells cultured on graphite showed a lower expression of osteonectin, osteopontin and osteocalcin, i.e., markers of osteogenic cell differentiation, and a lower content of alkaline phosphatase and total protein after pre-soaking both graphite and nanotube compacts in the culture medium with BMP-2 (Li et al, 2009b). In our earlier studies, graphite was prepared by pyrolysis, i.e., by a process defined as thermochemical decomposition of organic material at elevated temperatures (above 430 °C) in the absence of oxygen.…”
Section: Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite its electrical conductivity, which is usually associated with the stimulatory effects on cell colonization and functioning, unmodified graphite is rather bioinert, i.e., less adhesive for cells . It is due to a relatively low ability of graphite to adsorb cell adhesionmediating proteins from the serum supplement of the culture medium Li et al, 2009a) and also bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), such as BMP-2, a factor promoting the osteogenic cell differentiation (Li et al, 2009b). As a result, graphite compacts allowed the attachment of mouse myoblastic C2C12 cells in significantly lower numbers compared to www.intechopen.com Nanocomposite and Nanostructured Carbon-based Films as Growth Substrates For Bone Cells 387 carbon nanotube compacts, which showed a significantly high capability to adsorb proteins.…”
Section: Graphitementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In other words, there arises an urgent need for a good knowledge on the interaction between intact (chemically unmodified) MWCNT and proteins, especially cell-surface proteins [1][2][3] . In this paper, the classical column chromatography methodwhich entailed the use of a MWCNT-packed columnproved to be useful for the separation of serum proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, which protein(s) is(are) responsible for this strong adhesion remains an unresolved question 1,2) . To compound the intrigue surrounding the interaction between CNT and proteins, there remains a lack of a definitive tool and approach to investigate the interaction mechanism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%