2006
DOI: 10.1128/cvi.00051-06
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mature Glycoprotein G Presents High Performance in Diagnosing Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Infection in Sera of Different Tanzanian Cohorts

Abstract: Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is a common sexually transmitted infection in sub-Saharan Africa. Glycoprotein G (gG) of HSV-2 elicits a type-specific antibody response and is widely used for serodiagnosis. gG is cleaved into a secreted portion (sgG-2) and a highly O-glycosylated mature portion (mgG-2). The performances of these two native immunosorbent purified antigens were compared in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) format with a commercially available assay (FOCUS2) using sera from blood d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
16
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
16
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, the FDAapproved and widely available HerpeSelect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Focus Technologies) has a high sensitivity and specificity, ranging from 96 to 100%, against the reference HSV-2 Western blot (WB) assay for testing of sera from North American or Western European populations but significantly lower specificity for testing of sera from adult African populations (2,7,16). Moreover, concordance between WB and HerpeSelect assays was found to vary between countries in sub-Saharan Africa (2,6,7,9) and according to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serostatus (16). HerpeSelect and other assays were compared in an evaluation study using African sera from population-based surveys, and the Kalon gG2-specific ELISA (Kalon Biologicals) was found to be as sensitive as and more specific than HerpeSelect, with WB as the reference method (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, the FDAapproved and widely available HerpeSelect enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Focus Technologies) has a high sensitivity and specificity, ranging from 96 to 100%, against the reference HSV-2 Western blot (WB) assay for testing of sera from North American or Western European populations but significantly lower specificity for testing of sera from adult African populations (2,7,16). Moreover, concordance between WB and HerpeSelect assays was found to vary between countries in sub-Saharan Africa (2,6,7,9) and according to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) serostatus (16). HerpeSelect and other assays were compared in an evaluation study using African sera from population-based surveys, and the Kalon gG2-specific ELISA (Kalon Biologicals) was found to be as sensitive as and more specific than HerpeSelect, with WB as the reference method (16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One study reported that the sensitivity of HerpeSelect increased for patients suffering from genital ulcer disease (GUD) compared to that for blood donors (6), perhaps because HerpeSelect may detect primary genital herpes earlier than the Kalon assay or even WB does (1,12).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, HSV suppressive therapy significantly reduces genital and plasma HIV-1 RNA levels in dually infected women (28). Seroepidemiological data from worldwide studies performed during the last decade have estimated the HSV-2 seroprevalence to range from 0% in children to more than 80% in selected populations such as STI cohorts in some African countries (14,36). For Poland, data are scarce, but recently, the prevalence of HSV-2 infection was described to vary between 6.5% and 12% from randomly selected serum samples in four geographic regions in Poland, not including Katowice (37).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Diagnosis of HSV-2 infection in sub-Saharan Africa and developing countries elsewhere, where the prevalence is high, has been problematic. Serologic tests for HSV-2 that use an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) or dot blot are technically simple and relatively inexpensive (15) but have been complicated by a variable rate of samples with positive HSV-2 ELISA and negative Western blot results (6,8,10,15). In addition, the Western blot assay is expensive, difficult to read, and inefficient for evaluating large numbers of samples for clinical trials (2).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%