2015
DOI: 10.3920/qas2014.0521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mature-ripe tomato spectral classification according to lycopene content and fruit type by visible, NIR reflectance and intrinsic fluorescence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The profiles present broad but identifiable bands, ascribable to the contributions of the main constituents of the food matrix such as water and sugar. Reflectance value is below 0.1 from 400 to 575 nm as previously detected by ElMasry and Sun ( 52 ), including an intense absorption peak between 450 and 475 nm as found by Ciaccheri et al ( 53 ). Above 560 nm, reflectance values rose sharply because of the red coloration of ripened fruits ( 54 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The profiles present broad but identifiable bands, ascribable to the contributions of the main constituents of the food matrix such as water and sugar. Reflectance value is below 0.1 from 400 to 575 nm as previously detected by ElMasry and Sun ( 52 ), including an intense absorption peak between 450 and 475 nm as found by Ciaccheri et al ( 53 ). Above 560 nm, reflectance values rose sharply because of the red coloration of ripened fruits ( 54 ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The variability of spectra was the highest in the Vis-NIR region between 650 and 930 nm. The reflectance maximum was measured between 700 and 705 nm, as found by Clément et al (52). In the NIR, there was a local absorption maximum at 976 nm.…”
Section: Spectral Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…A comparison of our results with those from other nondestructive spectroscopic and chemometric techniques reported in the literature is difficult to make, given the variability in the measuring devices, elaboration of data, cultivars, and growing conditions of the plants, as well as in the chemical analysis of the lycopene. Moreover, no studies have been reported on the seasonal effects on lycopene prediction models, and only a single study concerning intercultivar lycopene prediction models has been found.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vitamin C content was estimated with a R 2 of 0.67 (Azadshahraki et al, 2018), total acidity with R 2 of 0.66-0.94 (Ding et al, 2016) and R 2 of 0.91-0.98 (Najjar and Abu-Khalaf, 2021), and firmness exhibited R 2 of 0.70-0.72 (Najjar and Abu-Khalaf, 2021). The analysis of b-carotene revealed R 2 values of 0.77-0.88 (Tilahun et al, 2018), phenols showed R 2 values of 0.76-0.98 (Ding et al, 2016), malic acid with R 2 of 0.27-0.42 (Torres et al, 2015), citric acid with R 2 of 0.66-0.94 (Ding et al, 2016) and lycopene with R 2 values ranging from 0.45-0.75 (Cleḿent et al, 2015), 0.73-0.83 (Ciaccheri et al, 2018) and0.85-0.89 (Tilahun et al, 2018). However, tomato exhibits differences in the structural and biochemical characteristics of different tissues, which leads to significant ramifications in the absorption and scattering of light inside the tomato fruit (Skolik et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%