2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturity-associated considerations for training load, injury risk, and physical performance in youth soccer: One size does not fit all

Abstract: Highlights Estimates of players’ maturity status should be taken every 3–4 months during an annual season, with a focus on players approaching and during peak height velocity. Key stakeholders should be educated about maturation and peak height velocity, particularly in relation to the potential use of bio-banding strategies. Clear lines of communication should be established with key stakeholders in order to identify the volume of weekly physical activity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
111
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(121 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
4
111
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Predicted maturity offset, defined as time before peak height velocity (PHV) [1,2], and estimated age at PHV, i.e., chronological age (CA) minus predicted offset, are widely used as estimates of maturity status (state of maturation at the time of observation) and/or timing (age at which a specific maturational event occurs) in studies of youth athletes and to a lesser extent in studies youth physical activity and fitness [3][4][5][6]. The original sex-specific equations require CA, sitting height, estimated leg length, height and weight [1], while the modified equations [2] require CA and height (both sexes) or sitting height (boys).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Predicted maturity offset, defined as time before peak height velocity (PHV) [1,2], and estimated age at PHV, i.e., chronological age (CA) minus predicted offset, are widely used as estimates of maturity status (state of maturation at the time of observation) and/or timing (age at which a specific maturational event occurs) in studies of youth athletes and to a lesser extent in studies youth physical activity and fitness [3][4][5][6]. The original sex-specific equations require CA, sitting height, estimated leg length, height and weight [1], while the modified equations [2] require CA and height (both sexes) or sitting height (boys).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current interest in the application of the maturity offset prediction equations in samples of youth athletes is considerable [3][4][5][6]. Predictions based on the original and modified equations, however, depend upon CA and body size at prediction, have reduced variation relative to observed ages at PHV, and have major limitations with early and late maturing youth as defined by observed ages at PHV [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak-height velocity has been suggested to coincide with increased risk and incidence of non-contact and training related injury in team sports [22][23][24] which is concerning for practitioners. It is common within literature to di-, or tri-chotomise the maturation process into periods, often termed pre-, circa-or post-PHV to categorise individuals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher incidence at PHV was reported also by other authors (6,19). According to Towlson et al (2020) during adolescent growth spurt, boys show a rapid growth (also between 7 and 12 cm per year), which may partially explain the phenomenon "adolescent awkwardness," whereby the trunk and lower limb length have increased but soft tissues have yet to adapt to the size and weight of the frame, causing abnormal movement mechanics that negatively impact performance. This rapid change in musculoskeletal structure and apparent lag time to adequate relative strength is individually variable based on maturity tempo, which likely corresponds to a variation in readiness to perform and, by inference, to vulnerability to injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Taking into account the specific nature of injuries, traumatic injury and overuse injuries did not show a significant difference among the three maturity groups. Traumatic injury incidence showed a tendency to increase from the year before PHV to the year of PHV, while after this (20). These maturation-dependent differences in injury risk should be a point of attention for practitioners, with particular regard to the highly demanding mechanical loading of training practices and intensified bouts of match-play often experienced during match-format football.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%