2017 4th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/conmedia.2017.8266031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maturity levels of academic information services of higher education using IT governance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the USA universities survey, which got replies from 438 respondents, shows a maturity level of 2.51 (Yanosky & Caruso, 2008). A better level is measured in Indonesia, with an average of 3.25 on 30 private HEIs (Kosasi et al, 2017). Finally, Abu Dhabi Universities have reported the level of maturity of 2.5 to 3 for two Institutions A and B (Ajami & Al-Qirim, 2013).…”
Section: Rq2: What Is the Geographical Coverage Of Itg Effects?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results of the USA universities survey, which got replies from 438 respondents, shows a maturity level of 2.51 (Yanosky & Caruso, 2008). A better level is measured in Indonesia, with an average of 3.25 on 30 private HEIs (Kosasi et al, 2017). Finally, Abu Dhabi Universities have reported the level of maturity of 2.5 to 3 for two Institutions A and B (Ajami & Al-Qirim, 2013).…”
Section: Rq2: What Is the Geographical Coverage Of Itg Effects?mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Finally, in the category of IT governance-oriented maturity models, in [40], they present a model that assesses maturity from the edge of service delivery processes, under the COBIT 4.1 framework. This has five maturity levels or indicators of process capacity: level 1-executed, level 2-managed, level 3-established, level 4-predictable and level 5-optimized of IT governance in university institutions under the model of COBIT 4.1 and contemplates the service delivery processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peneliti 2018), (Kerr & Murthy, 2013) Tata Kelola TI pada Universitas (Kosasi, 2017), (Jairak, Praneetpolgrang, & Subsermsri, 2015), (Jairak & Praneetpolgrang, 2013), (Juiz, Gómez, & Barceló, 2012), (Bianchi, Sousa, Pereira, & Luciano, 2017) Peran Tata kelola dalam Pemerintahan dan rumah sakit (publik) (Ekanata & Girsang, 2015), (Lapihu & Isnanto, 2017), (Shalannanda & Hakimi, 2016) 4.2. RQ2.…”
Section: Temaunclassified
“…Untuk penelitian selanjutnya, diharapkan dapat fokus pada peningkatan kerangka kerja, dan menguji kerangka kerja yang diajukan pada studi kasus lainnya. Penelitian yang dilakukan oleh (Prasad et al, 2014) COBIT (Joshi et al, 2018), (Ibrahim & Nurpulaela, 2017), (Kosasi et al, 2017), (Kosasi, 2017), (Sandfreni & Adikara, 2017), (Kerr & Murthy, 2013 memperhatikan keefektifan dari struktur tata kelola ini untuk layanan cloud computing dalam berbagai sektor organisasi ataupun mempertimbangkan struktur lainnya yang mungkin lebih cocok untuk layanan cloud computing tertentu.…”
Section: Field Of Studyunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation