2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.padiff.2021.100029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Matuszewska–Orlicz indices of the Sobolev conjugate Young function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Intuitively, this condition implies that the norms are in H ψ and H φ are weaker than those in our hypothesis class H K , allowing us to study convergence in these larger spaces of sample estimators constructed in H K . The second part of the assumption requiring t φ(t) and φ(t) ψ(t) to be nondecreasing extends this behavior as t → ∞; collectively the two growth conditions characterize 1 φ and 1 ψ as resembling a Young's function; a requirement commonly imposed in the study of Orlicz spaces [3]. The requirement that t φ(t) is additionally concave enables the application of a Gagliardo-Nirenberg type interpolation inequality [24] that relates L ∞ norms to those in H K and L 2 (ν), which will be crucial in our analysis of uniform error rates.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intuitively, this condition implies that the norms are in H ψ and H φ are weaker than those in our hypothesis class H K , allowing us to study convergence in these larger spaces of sample estimators constructed in H K . The second part of the assumption requiring t φ(t) and φ(t) ψ(t) to be nondecreasing extends this behavior as t → ∞; collectively the two growth conditions characterize 1 φ and 1 ψ as resembling a Young's function; a requirement commonly imposed in the study of Orlicz spaces [3]. The requirement that t φ(t) is additionally concave enables the application of a Gagliardo-Nirenberg type interpolation inequality [24] that relates L ∞ norms to those in H K and L 2 (ν), which will be crucial in our analysis of uniform error rates.…”
Section: Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…where the last inequality follows from the fact that F d κ(•) is nonincreasing. Therefore, since ψ satisfies the ∆ 2 condition (2), and Ψ has finite nonzero extension indices (see p.274 of [3] for a definition), we have by Lemma 2.16 in…”
Section: A Proof Of Theorem 1 and Lemmamentioning
confidence: 97%