“…So ANT scholars aim to follow how scientific facts, concepts and theories emerge from a construction process that consists of the 'assembling' and 'disassembling' a set of heterogeneous elements referred to as an 'actornetwork' (Alcadipani & Hassard, 2010;Callon & Latour, 1981;Latour, 2005). For instance, an ANT account of the construction of probability theory would show how such a theory came to exist in the 17 th century thanks to material devices such as 'honest' six-faced dices (David, 1955), the social practice of gambling in the French court society and in England, and the epistolary relationships between mathematicians (Fermat, Laplace, Pascal) and noblemen (the Chevalier de Moivre, the 2 nd Earl Stanhope) interested in solving problems of chance (Bellhouse & Genest, 2007). Building on these elements, ANT scholars would explain that a complex set of relations between human beings interested in games of chance, material artifacts (e.g., dices, playing cards) and a set of socially situated practices (e.g., gambling)…”