2007 Workshop on High Performance Switching and Routing 2007
DOI: 10.1109/hpsr.2007.4281267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max-min Utility Fairness in Link Aggregated Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We assume the following four major network applications: a) VoIP traffic, b) IPTV traffic, c) TCP elastic traffic, and d) HTTP traffic. The respective utility functions of these services were previously defined in [11][12]. In this paper, we assume that the application types for light and heavy users are HTTP and TCP elastic, respectively, to simplify comparison scenarios.…”
Section: Utility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume the following four major network applications: a) VoIP traffic, b) IPTV traffic, c) TCP elastic traffic, and d) HTTP traffic. The respective utility functions of these services were previously defined in [11][12]. In this paper, we assume that the application types for light and heavy users are HTTP and TCP elastic, respectively, to simplify comparison scenarios.…”
Section: Utility Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, varied types of services, which have different quality-of-service (QoS) requirements, affect the others. Utility-based bandwidth resource allocation solutions can provide QoS support for different services [6][7][8][9]. However, it is not utilized in DOCSIS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%