2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max-Sur-CSP on Two Elements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An early result on this problem family was the complexity classification of all two-element structures [7, Proposition 6.11], [8, Proposition 4.7]. There is recent interest in understanding the complexity of these problems, which perhaps focuses on the cases where the structure B is a graph; we refer the reader to the survey [3] for further information and pointers, and also can reference the related articles [13,10,11]. The introduction in the survey [3] suggests that the problems SCSP(B) "seem to be very difficult to classify in terms of complexity", and that "standard methods to prove easiness or hardness fail."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An early result on this problem family was the complexity classification of all two-element structures [7, Proposition 6.11], [8, Proposition 4.7]. There is recent interest in understanding the complexity of these problems, which perhaps focuses on the cases where the structure B is a graph; we refer the reader to the survey [3] for further information and pointers, and also can reference the related articles [13,10,11]. The introduction in the survey [3] suggests that the problems SCSP(B) "seem to be very difficult to classify in terms of complexity", and that "standard methods to prove easiness or hardness fail."…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The generalised Min-Cut problem consists in minimising an objective function f + g, where f is a superadditive set function given by an oracle and g is a cut function (same as in the Min-Cut problem); see Section 5 for the details. We prove that the running time of our algorithm is roughly O n 20α , thus improving on the bound of O n 3 3α established in [43] (one of the two extended conference abstracts of this paper) for the special case of {0, 1}-valued languages.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…In [23], a weighted relation γ is called PDS if both Feas(γ) and Opt(γ) are essentially downsets. For a {0, 1}-valued weighted relation, this condition is equivalent to that of being almost-min-min [43]. By Corollary 30, PDS and EDS are equivalent concepts for languages of finite size.…”
Section: Lemma 25 a Crisp Weighted Relation Is Eds If And Only If Itmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations