2011
DOI: 10.1215/0094033x-1221785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max Weber and Charisma: A Transatlantic Affair

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As Joshua Derman has argued in his article "Max Weber and Charisma: A Transatlantic Affair", the popularized concept of "charisma", akin to religious star-power, found its way to American social theory only after a long process ( [12], pp. 87-88).…”
Section: Weber In Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As Joshua Derman has argued in his article "Max Weber and Charisma: A Transatlantic Affair", the popularized concept of "charisma", akin to religious star-power, found its way to American social theory only after a long process ( [12], pp. 87-88).…”
Section: Weber In Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…87-88). Derman demonstrated that initially the American political theoreticians used the Weberian concept of "charisma" to address the demagogic powers of Hitler, Mussolini, and other dictators ( [12], pp. 72-81).…”
Section: Weber In Americamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Some of these objections were moral, 1 but the main sociological discomfort with charisma stemmed from perceptions of an essentialist “individualism” (Shils 1965:202) or “trait atomism” (Parsons 1963:lxxiii) in Weber’s formulation (see also Derman 2011:53, 67-68)—that is, the anagogic notion that charismatic qualities are inborn, not subject to the normal forces of socialization, even miraculous and God-given (Adair-Toteff 2002; Swatos and Kivisto 1991). By contrast, traditional disciplinary norms suggest that the sociological mandate is to map and scrutinize the structural firmaments of power (Mills [1956] 1999), thereby acting as a salve to fascinations with lonely geniuses, explaining them “from without,” via social, political, and cultural contextualizations (DeNora 1997; Geertz 1977; Lindholm 2013; Palmer 2008; Smith 2000; Willner and Willner 1965).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%