The Cambridge Companion to Weber 2000
DOI: 10.1017/ccol9780521561495.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max Weber as legal historian

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 40. He had, after all, himself given up a career in the law, bored by “clerical tasks of an essentially mechanical nature” (Berman and Reid 2000:224).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 40. He had, after all, himself given up a career in the law, bored by “clerical tasks of an essentially mechanical nature” (Berman and Reid 2000:224).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A larger but unstated goal is to direct scholars’ attention to this difficult and neglected part of Weber’s thinking about law; it is my view that here they have succeeded admirably. Weber may have been wrong about certain points in the history of law, but he continues to offer much both to the contemporary legal scholar as well as the contemporary sociologist (Berman and Reid, Jr, 2000: 231, 239; Sahni, 2009: 226–7). Weber taught economics, wrote political theory and helped create sociology but he ‘remained a son of his [legal] discipline’ (Anter, 2007: 28).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%