The sections of Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft that are devoted to law (Recht) have a rather long and perhaps justified history of being ignored. Carl Schmitt noted that Weber's Recht contained 'a monstrous amount of sociological material' and Karl Engish maintained that it dealt with several dozen legal topics (Schmitt, 1923: 12; Engish, 1964: 68-9). Anthony Kronman insisted that it does not 'constitute a work' but gives the impression that it is 'a vast hodgepodge of ideas and observations' (Kronman, 1983: 2). In Kronman's view this overabundance makes it 'likely to seem nearly unintelligible' while Manfred Rehbinder suggested that 'The style is miserable and the assertion is opaque' (Kronman, 1983: 1; Rehbinder, 1987: 127). Werner Gephart and Siegfried Hermes simply label it a 'riddle' (Weber, 2010: xix). Gephart and Hermes are the editors responsible for the recently published volume on law in the Max Weber Gesamtausgabe and have taken on the task of making the Rechtssoziologie [sociology of law] as understandable as possible -a task that they acknowledge as daunting. They warn of the likelihood of 'sinking in an ocean of legal history' that makes up the work. Given its notorious difficulty, why read Weber's Recht? Stephen Turner and Regis Factor provide one answer; that Weber was trained in law and was exposed 'to the best of contemporary legal thinking, at a time when legal science was the discipline at the top of the academic hierarchy' (Turner and Factor, 1994: 3-4). Wolfgang Schluchter offers another: 'the sociology of law is principally an aspect of general social theory' and law is one of the preconditions 'of the constitution of social life' (Schluchter, 2002: 258, 273). Gephart and Hermes