1955
DOI: 10.2307/1337776
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…
innovations had to be supported either by a fetwa, which could almost always be obtained in a particular case, sometimes in good faith and sometimes through trickery, or by the disputatious casuistry of the several competing orthodox schools. (Rheinstein 1964: 241) 9
…”
Section: Weber's Characterization Of Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…
innovations had to be supported either by a fetwa, which could almost always be obtained in a particular case, sometimes in good faith and sometimes through trickery, or by the disputatious casuistry of the several competing orthodox schools. (Rheinstein 1964: 241) 9
…”
Section: Weber's Characterization Of Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
may thus well stand in the way of the interests of the bourgeois classes and it may indeed be said that England achieved capitalistic supremacy among the nations not because but rather in spite of its judicial system. (Rheinstein 1964: 230–1)
…”
Section: Weber's Characterization Of Islammentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Instead, we need a mechanism through which individuals can learn to improve their strategies over time. If we enable individuals to compare themselves to others, and adopt more successful strategies, then we can take a learning interpretation of the evolutionary mechanism [40], without needing to remove and replicate individuals. However, this learning interpretation requires that the private strategies of individuals are available for observation by other agents, which is again an unreasonable assumption.…”
Section: Vengefulness Boldnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Le modèle à « responsables peu nombreux » typique des systèmes de type Westminster, offre aux ministères et aux départements la structure la plus proche de la conception wébérienne de l'administration (Gerth et Mills, 1958 ;Rheinstein, 1968). Dans les systèmes de ce genre, et de façon stylisée, un seul responsable, le ministre, est chargé de la politique à suivre et prend des décisions à ce sujet sur la base des informations que lui fournissent des fonctionnaires de carrière professionnels et impartiaux.…”
Section: Pressions Particulières En Faveur De La Réactivité Politiqueunclassified