2014
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13695-0_35
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MAXICULTURE: Assessing the Impact of EU Projects in the Digital Cultural Heritage Domain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, issues of ownership and authorship frame what becomes imaginable. In cases where digital cultural heritage materials have been made accessible online, they are often released under restrictive terms of use (Bellini et al 2014, Estermann 2015 and the scope for their circulation and collaborative reuse is often limited (Terras 2015, Marttila and Hyyppä. 2014a).…”
Section: Frictions In Digital Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, issues of ownership and authorship frame what becomes imaginable. In cases where digital cultural heritage materials have been made accessible online, they are often released under restrictive terms of use (Bellini et al 2014, Estermann 2015 and the scope for their circulation and collaborative reuse is often limited (Terras 2015, Marttila and Hyyppä. 2014a).…”
Section: Frictions In Digital Cultural Heritagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Along with the digitizing of cultural heritage, new digital tools are also creating novel ways for people to access, appropriate and reinvent culture. Despite these developments, cultural and memory institutions are not providing as much access as they could to their digitized collections (Bellini, et al 2014), nor are they creating good conditions for people's creative re--use activities (Terras, 2015). For some commentators, this situation is turning into the enclosing of important parts of our cultural heritage (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%