Maxillary alveolar bone ridge width augmentation using the frame-shaped corticotomy expansion technique

Lalo, J.; Adouani, H.; Belhassen, S.; Zaitri, N.; Teillaud, C.

doi:10.1016/j.jormas.2019.09.001

Cited by 6 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 7 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Tooth loss may usually be accompanied by the reduction of alveolar bone, thus causing the severe atrophy of alveolar bone and forming the blade-shaped alveolar ridge [9][10][11] . It is a common clinical problem to repair the posterior missing tooth in the atrophic alveolar ridge [12][13][14] . In the clinical observation of this study, the alveolar ridge was mostly triangular and its top was narrow before implantation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures are also linked with a risk of membrane exposure and membrane rupture, leading to infection [18,19] . Interpositional augmentation involves ridge split and ridge expansion, both of which have attained ideal outcomes in the maxilla [14] . But an increased risk of block fracture after osteotomy is seen in the mandible because of the thick cortical bone.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Clinical study of alveolar bone mucosa-periosteal bone flap as horizontal bone augmentation

Xu,

Liu

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The present work focused on observing the efficacy of alveolar bone mucosa- periosteal bone flap in alveolar ridge horizontal bone augmentation with dental implant placement. Methods This was a retrospective study involving 49 patients with 99 implants, which was conducted to measure the alveolar ridge widths pre- and post-operatively. The alveolar ridge widths were 4.77 ± 1.49 mm preoperatively and 7.68 ± 1.60 mm postoperatively. Results There was a significant difference in alveolar ridge width before and after operation (P < 0.05), to be specific, the alveolar ridge width increased by 2.91 ± 0.11 mm after operation. Conclusion These results suggest that alveolar bone mucosa-periosteal bone flap technique is an effective method to increase the alveolar ridge width with the simultaneous placement of dental implants, which is worthy to be recommended in clinical practice.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical study of alveolar bone mucosa-periosteal bone flap as horizontal bone augmentation

Xu,

Liu

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…21 When used as a barrier film, the technical sensitivity is high. 22,23 The emergence of short implants provides another solution, especially in the case of insufficient vertical bone volume in the posterior teeth, but the crown-to-root ratio is imbalanced after restoration, and the long-term prognosis remains controversial. 24 Marx et al proposed a soft tissue matrix expansion (STME) bone augmentation surgery in 2002, called the tent-pole technique.…”

Section: ■ Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The effect of GBR combined with titanium mesh for vertical bone augmentation is considerable, but the titanium mesh itself has the problem that the edge is easily exposed, which leads to failure of bone augmentation . When used as a barrier film, the technical sensitivity is high. , The emergence of short implants provides another solution, especially in the case of insufficient vertical bone volume in the posterior teeth, but the crown-to-root ratio is imbalanced after restoration, and the long-term prognosis remains controversial …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Implant Healing Abutment Supporting Vertical Bone Augments in the Posterior Mandibular Area

Zhao

Zhang

et al. 2023

ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

To address the problem of insufficient bone mass in the implant area, we focused on the vertical increment of the posterior mandibular area to increase bone mass with the aid of a healing abutment. Data of patients with insufficient vertical bone height in the posterior mandibular area were collected, and vertical increment of alveolar bone operations was performed with the aid of a healing abutment. Preoperative residual alveolar bone height, immediate postoperative alveolar bone height, and 6-month postoperative alveolar bone height were recorded, with peri-implant soft tissue results 6 months after surgery using the modified plaque index and sulcus bleeding index. Twelve patients, aged 42–73 years, with an average age of 55.91 ± 11.58 years, received vertical bone augmentation in the posterior mandibular region supported by implant healing abutments. Fifteen SLA TSIII OSSTEM implants were utilized in the 12 patients; one patient failed in vertical bone augmentation at one site (H0 = 0 mm). The vertical bone augmentation effect of two patients at two sites was 0 mm < H0 < 1 mm, and the vertical bone augmentation effect of 12 sites in nine patients was H0 ≥ 1 mm. The implant success rate was 93.3%, and the mean vertical bone gain was 2.91 mm. Peri-implant soft tissue parameters are as follows: mean modified plaque index, 1.92; mean modified sulcus bleeding index, 1.21; and mean probing depth, 3.18. No clinically observable complications occurred. Bone augmentation supported by the implant healing abutment showed the characteristics of “platform transfer”, with good formation of the implant–bone interface. The bone augmentation surgery was completed at the same time as the implant placement, which reduced the pain of multiple operations and shortened waiting times. We provide a novel idea to solve the problem of insufficient vertical bone height in the posterior mandibular region.

show abstract

“…A mallet may be useful and an electrical model was suggested to provide certain advantages 64 . Other surgical modifications, such as expanding only the concaved area using a frame‐shaped corticotomy plate expansion 69 or adding a fourth corticotomy line to the expansion procedure to complete the temporary removal of the buccal plate, 70 have been suggested. With regard to the latter, once the implant placement took place, the free buccal plate was repositioned and re‐stabilized by a horizontal central fixation screw.…”

Section: The Ars Surgical Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Lateral augmentation of the jaw by the split expansion ridge technique. A critical review

Artzi

2023

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Bone augmentation has become a routine procedure to enhance and/or repair a deficient or resorbed alveolar ridge for predictable and successful implant placement. The split expansion ridge i.e., the alveolar ridge splitting (ARS) procedure, is one of the less invasive procedures, and is characterized by minor morbidity. This would allow to widen narrow ridges in order to allow implant reconstruction in a sufficient bone volume. Its efficacy and long‐term stability rely upon clinical opinions and long‐term retrospective studies, while prospective comparative studies and randomized controlled trials are rare. This critical review presents the development of this technique, describes the surgical procedure, and provides technical notes and modifications. The learning curve and in‐depth knowledge of the oral anatomy, as well as the recognition of incidence and management of complications are of utmost importance in the clinical application of the ARS procedure.

show abstract

Maxillary alveolar bone ridge width augmentation using the frame-shaped corticotomy expansion technique

Cited by 6 publications

References 7 publications

Clinical study of alveolar bone mucosa-periosteal bone flap as horizontal bone augmentation

Clinical study of alveolar bone mucosa-periosteal bone flap as horizontal bone augmentation

Application of Implant Healing Abutment Supporting Vertical Bone Augments in the Posterior Mandibular Area

Lateral augmentation of the jaw by the split expansion ridge technique. A critical review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About