2021
DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6329.20.04403-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillary dento-skeletal outcomes after orthopedic forward (class III) and backward (class II) traction in growing subjects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present case, Klammt II was the therapy of choice due to its bimaxillary action, which made it possible to treat mandibular retrognathism, as well as to reduce the proclination of the upper incisors, correcting the accentuated overbite and overjt, in agreement with studies reported in the literature [4]; [5]; [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present case, Klammt II was the therapy of choice due to its bimaxillary action, which made it possible to treat mandibular retrognathism, as well as to reduce the proclination of the upper incisors, correcting the accentuated overbite and overjt, in agreement with studies reported in the literature [4]; [5]; [6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the two-phase treatment, the first is carried out in mixed dentition with potential application of functional jaw orthopedics, followed by a corrective phase in the early permanent dentition [4]. The expected corrections through functional devices are more easily achieved in the transitional dentition, because the dental and skeletal structures are in full change, although the peak of puberty is still far away [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%