2015
DOI: 10.1902/cap.2015.140087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maxillary Sinus Membrane Repair With Amnion-Chorion Barriers: A Retrospective Case Series

Abstract: Introduction: Schneiderian membrane perforation is the most common complication of maxillary sinus augmentation procedures and has been associated with a variety of post-surgical problems. Multiple techniques to repair perforated Schneiderian membranes have been reported in dental literature with materials such as connective tissue, buccal fat pads, and resorbable collagen membranes. While these reparative options have proven successful, they are technique sensitive and time consuming. The aim of this case ser… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Perforations of Schneiderian membranes were repaired by many researchers. In many studies, commonly used collagen membranes for treatment of membrane perforation . Although several techniques have been suggested, no proven method has been proposed for repairing sinus membrane perforations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perforations of Schneiderian membranes were repaired by many researchers. In many studies, commonly used collagen membranes for treatment of membrane perforation . Although several techniques have been suggested, no proven method has been proposed for repairing sinus membrane perforations .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many studies, commonly used collagen membranes for treatment of membrane perforation. [14][15][16] Although several techniques have been suggested, no proven method has been proposed for repairing sinus membrane perforations. 17 The classification of membrane perforations was previously described by size and degree of separation of the soft and hard tissues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 11 studies, patients had a CM allograft 3,[52][53][54][55][56]58,[60][61][62]66 whereas in the other 10 studies an ACM allograft was performed. 37,57,59,[63][64][65][67][68][69][70] Membranes were freeze-dried in seven studies, 3,52,56,58,[60][61][62] decellularized then freeze-dried in one study, 70 de-epithelialized and dehydrated by the Purion process in nine studies, 37,57,59,[63][64][65][67][68][69] and just dehydrated in two studies. 53,55 In two publications, the preservation methods were not mentioned.…”
Section: Methods Of Cm/acm Preservation and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The membranes supplied by the Tata Memorial Hospital tissue bank were irradiated with γ radiation, 3,[52][53][54][55][56]58,[60][61][62]66 Kakabadze et al used γ rays at a dose of 15 kGy, 70 and the BioXclude membranes were sterilized by γ rays or irradiated by electron beams at a dose of approximately 17.5 kGy. 37,57,59,[63][64][65][67][68][69] The membranes were used in monolayer in all studies, but some authors specified that if the membrane folds on itself together, it was not unfolded. 37 None of the selected articles mentioned which side of the membrane was applied in contact with the defect.…”
Section: Methods Of Cm/acm Preservation and Usementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation