2003
DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2003.11746258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal Bite Force and Its Association with Signs and Symptoms of TMD, Occlusion, and Body Mass Index in a Cohort of Young Adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
43
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
4
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present experiment and in agreement with other studies (Barkhordar et al. 1989, Akkayan & Gülmez 2002, Zhi‐Yue & Yu‐Xing 2003), there was no statistically significant difference amongst groups (Tables 2 and 3) and all of them would theoretically withstand functional loads of 23 to 29 kgf in the anterior region of dentate patients (Ahlberg et al. 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In the present experiment and in agreement with other studies (Barkhordar et al. 1989, Akkayan & Gülmez 2002, Zhi‐Yue & Yu‐Xing 2003), there was no statistically significant difference amongst groups (Tables 2 and 3) and all of them would theoretically withstand functional loads of 23 to 29 kgf in the anterior region of dentate patients (Ahlberg et al. 2003).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The association between the presence of TMD and reduced MBF is contradictory in the literature and may be dependent on the severity of the TMD in the given sample (14)(15)(16)(17). Our results agree with those of previous studies (2,18,19), where no association between TMD and bite force was observed, and neither subjective symptoms nor clinical signs of TMD correlated significantly with MBF values (14).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…De Boever et al (14) reported forces of between 2.4 and 7.2 kg (23.5 and 70.6 N) using transmitters in removable pontics, and concluded that functional chewing forces are variable from session to session and change with the consistency and viscosity of the food. More recently, maximum biting force on the first molar was reported as approximately 859 N (15), and elsewhere as (878 N) (16). The mean fracture load recorded in this study for the control group was 1198 N that is higher than both the maximum chewing and biting loads reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%