1994
DOI: 10.1016/0020-0190(94)90098-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Maximal matching stabilizes in quadratic time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Step complexity Round complexity [10,12,9] sequential adversarial O(m) [7] distributed adversarial finite [2] distributed fair…”
Section: Reference Daemonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Step complexity Round complexity [10,12,9] sequential adversarial O(m) [7] distributed adversarial finite [2] distributed fair…”
Section: Reference Daemonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hsu and Huang [10] gave the first such algorithm and proved a bound of O(n 3 ) on the number of steps assuming an adversarial daemon. This analysis was later improved to O(n 2 ) by Tel [12] and finally to O(m) by Hedetniemi et al [9]. The original algorithm assumes an anonymous networks and operates therefore under the sequential daemon in order to achieve symmetry breaking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2] Tel shows that, in fact, the HsuHuang algorithm runs in O(n 2 ) time. More precisely, Tel shows that for any network having n nodes, the Hsu-Huang algorithm will stabilize within 1 2 n 2 + 2n + 1 moves.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For sparse networks such as trees, our result implies an O(n) bound. In both papers [1] and [2] a variant function is used for the complexity analysis. Our analysis uses a new proof technique that counts the number of moves that occur on a given edge.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], Hsu and Huang show that it is bounded by O(n 3 ), where n is the number of nodes. In [3], Tel provides an almost tight upper bound, which is 1 2 n 2 +2n+1 if n is even and 1 2 n 2 +n− 1 2 if n is odd. In [4] Tel gives a more concise proof for the O(n 2 ) bound than [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%